TABLE A1.

Literature overview

Authors (year)	Method				Criteria						Other	Context	Different preferences
	DCE	BB	BW	Rank	Coef./MRS	Scale	Scale dyn.	Efficiency	Self‐rep.	Ext. validity
Single method—within method comparison
Ben‐Akiva et al. (1991)				√	√	√						Transport	Yes
Delle Site et al. (2019)			√		√			√		√	Probit models	Transport	Yes
Hausman and Ruud (1987)				√	√	√						Transport	Yes
Hawkins et al. (2019)			√		√	√					Out‐of‐sample prediction	Marketing	No
Scarpa et al. (2011)			√			√	√					Environment	No
Lancsar et al. (2013)			√		√			√				Health	No
Multimethod—between method comparison
Akaichi et al. (2013)	√			√	√					√	Proportion chosen, in‐sample prediction	Agriculture	Yes
Caparrós et al. (2008)	√			√	√	√			√			Environment	No
Chang et al. (2009)	√			√	√					√	Market shares	Marketing	Yes
Petrolia et al. (2018)	√		√		√	√		√			Status‐quo, attribute non‐attendance	Environment	No
Xie et al. (2014)	√		√		√			√	√		Intraclass corr. Coeff.	Health	No
Yangui et al. (2019)	√		√	√	√					√	Intra‐rater reliability	Agriculture	No
Multimethod—within and between method comparison
Giergiczny et al. (2017)	√	√	√		√	√			√			Transport	Yes
Hawkins et al. (2014)	√		√		√						Proportion chosen, in‐sample prediction	Marketing	No
Krucien et al. (2019)	√		√		√	√						Health	Yes
This study		√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√			Health	Yes

Abbreviations: BB, best‐best; BW, best‐worst; DCE, discrete choice experiment.