Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;61(44):e202209138. doi: 10.1002/anie.202209138

Table 1.

E H–L defined as the E(HOMO)–E(LUMO) energy gap (related to E hybr) is evaluated at the Hückel level (in β units). y 0 is computed by Equation (1). [19] JT values (see Supporting Information) are obtained by using an alternating series of Hückel β values of 0.9 and 1.1 according to the bond alternation pattern of the respective [4n]annulene.[a,b]

E H–L

y 0

E H–L

y 0

1

0

1

11

0.29

0.316

2

0.47

0.214

12

0.45

0.287

2‐JT

0.61

0.140

13

0.14

0.643

3

0.66

0.084

14

1.00

0.058

4

0.30

0.228

15

0

1

5

0

1

16

0.66

0.086

6

0.31

0.199

17

0.27

0.150

7

0.16

0.575

18

0.50

0.112

8

0.62

0.299

19

0

1

8‐JT

0.69

0.295

20

0.82

0.064

9

0.90

0.088

21

0.34

0.159

10

0.45

0.121

22

0.38

0.117

[a] For phenalenyl (14) and olympicene (16) y 0 represents triradical character; for triangulene (20) y 0 represents pentaradical character. For all other molecules, y 0 represents diradical character. [b] For 14, 16, and 20 the HOMO to SOMO energy gap is shown.