Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 18;33(11):2250–2260. doi: 10.1111/jce.15657

Table 3.

Efficacy outcomes, including differences between primary and satellite centers cohorts

Efficacy outcomes comparison All patients Primary center Satellite centers p
Mean follow‐up of 13.5 ± 3.2 months (n = 80) (n = 47) (n = 33)
Freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, after one procedure, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs, no. (%) 69 (86%) 43 (91%) 26 (79%) 0.19
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia, after one procedure, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs, no. (%) 43 (54%) 25 (53%) 18 (55%) 0.90
Freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, after one procedure or more,a with or without antiarrhythmic drugs, no. (%) 71 (89%) 44 (94%) 27 (82%) 0.15
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia, after one procedure or more,a with or without antiarrhythmic drugs, no. (%) 58 (73%) 35 (74%) 23 (70%) 0.64

Note: Categorical data were compared between primary and satellite centers using χ 2 or Fisher test. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.0.0 (www.r-project.org). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

a

On average, 1.3 procedures/patient: 1.3 procedures/patient for reference center and 1.2 procedures/patient for satellite centers.