Table 3.
Summary of pentacoordinated copper(II) complexes with ancillary ligands and better IC50 values (μM) in different cell lines.
Compound |
Metal geometry |
Exposure time [h] |
Cell lines |
IC50 value [μM] |
Main feature |
Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cu‐24 |
Square pyramidal |
72 |
A‐549 HCT‐116 HeLa MDA‐MB‐231 SH‐SY5Y HASM‐C1 HASM‐C2 |
1.93±1.56 1.79±0.43 3.13±0.51 3.60±0.37 1.08±0.63 >12.50 >12.50 |
The anticancer activity depends on the presence of the amino group in the phen co‐ligand |
[67] |
Cu‐32 |
48 |
HUVEC C33A HeLa |
3.60±0.05, 2.22±0.17 1.02±0.03 |
Anticancer activity depends on the phen co‐ligand and its aromaticity |
[70] |
|
Cu‐37 |
HeLa MCF‐7 Hep‐G2 |
0.46±0.01 0.94±0.06 0.47±0.06 |
Anticancer activity depends on the presence of the phen ancillary ligand |
[72] |
||
Cu‐66 |
72 |
A‐2780 MCF‐7 |
0.75±0.2 2.5±0.6 |
Anticancer activity depends on the presence of the phen ancillary ligand |
[88] |
|
Cu‐67 |
A‐2780 MCF‐7 |
0.54±0.2 2.7±0.8 |
||||
Cu‐68 |
A‐2780 MCF‐7 HL‐60 HeLa |
0.29±0.01 3.5±1.2 1.51±0.37 4.2±0.6 |