Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 8;131(5):325–346. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13782

TABLE 3.

Detailed data from included DPYD genotype studies

First author, year published (PMID) Study design Pre‐treatment dose reduction based on DPYD genotype (yes/no) n with DPYD genotype data n compound heterzygous or homozygous for DPYD variants Toxcity (grade ≥ 3) in DPYD wild‐type patients Toxcity (grade ≥ 3) in DPYD variant carriers (pre‐treatment dose reductions based on DPYD variants) Toxcity (grade ≥ 3) in DPYD variant carriers without pre‐treatment dose reductions (control group) Toxicity (grade ≥ 3) in patients homozygous or compound heterozygous for DPYD variants (control group)
Henricks 2018 (30348537) Prospective Yes (DPYD variant carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (D949V and HapB3) or 50% (DPYD*2A and DPYD*13)) 1103 4 patients were found. All 4 Excluded before treatment n = 1018/8% n = 85/20% No 4 patients were found. Excluded.
Wigle 2021 (33620159) Retrospective Yes. 50% (HapB3 25–50%) 1435 No patients were found. n = 1347/21.1% n = 47/13% n = 41/24%. Retrospective samples. Full dose No patients found
Lunenburg 2018 (30361102) Prospective/Retrospective analysis Yes/no. 50 or 75% dose reduction 894 2 patients received normal doses. (no tox data reported) n = 7761/13.6% N = 22/22,7 n = 34/23,5% Pooled with heterozygous. n = 34/23,5%
Etienne‐Grimaldi 2017 (28481884) Retrospective No dose reduction 243 No dose intervention n = 239/11.8% No dose intervention n = 11/45.5% No patients found
Meulendijks 2016 (26804235) Retrospective No dose reduction 1592 No dose intervention n = 1429/10% No dose intervention n = 79/14% (11/79) No patients found
Froehlich 2015 (24923815) Retrospective No dose reduction 500 No dose intervention All patients including DPYD‐variant carriers 14% No dose intervention n = 33/15.3% No patients found
Shakeel 2021 (33410339) Retrospective No dose reduction 582 No dose intervention n = 543/18.1% No dose intervention n = 39/36.5% 2 patients. HapB3/HabB3 + *2A/HapB3
Capitain 2020 (32973417) Retrospective No dose reduction 472 No dose intervention n = 377/48% No dose intervention n = 90/89% n = 5/100% (4 dead of tox. Last 1 grade 4)
Ruzzo 2017 (29065426) Retrospective No dose reduction 508 No dose intervention ALL PATIENTS INCLUDING VARIANTS n = 508/38.2% No dose intervention DPYD *2A (HR 15.34, 4.72–49.89) D494V (HR 3.02, 1.12–8.16) HapB3 (HR 0.99 [0.37–2.6]) No DPYD*13 found No patients found
Boige 2016 (26794347) Retrospective No dose reduction 1545 No dose intervention ALL PATIENTS INCLUDING VARIANTSn = 1545/49.5% No dose intervention D949V (OR 6.3 [2–27]) DP YD*2A (OR 2.2[0.6–10]) DPYD*13 (OR 0.7 [0.079–6.2]) HapB3 (OR 1 [0.55–1.8]) No patients found
DelRe 2019 (30723313) Retrospective No dose reduction 1254 No dose intervention Comparison of two cohorts. Cohort 1(tox) (n = 982) grade 3 neutropenia 4.7% /Cohort 2 n = 272/0% tox No dose intervention *2A(Febrile neutropenia: OR 4.2, p < 0.5) D949V (diarrhoea: OR 2.78, p < 0.05) No DPYD*13 or HapB3 found No patients found
Deenen 2011 (21498394) Retrospective No dose reduction 568 No dose intervention ALL PATIENTS INCLUDING VARIANTS/n = 568/85% * Any (non)hematologic toxicity No dose intervention Any (non)hematologic toxicity: DPYD*13/n = 1/0% HabB3 n = 28 / 93% DPYD*2A n = 7/100% D949V n = 8/88% Total = 40/44/91% Some for HapB3. Unknown number. Pooled with HapB3 heterzyous

Abbreviations: DPYD, gene encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; toxcity grading, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE); [U], plasma uracil concentration; [UH2], plasma dihydrouracil concentration.