Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 8:1–30. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6

Table 3.

OLS Results

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Analysis

− 0.50***

(0.06)

− 0.49***

(0.07)

− 0.49***

(0.07)

− 0.48***

(0.08)

− 0.48***

(0.08)

Selection

− 0.56***

(0.06)

− 0.54***

(0.07)

− 0.54***

(0.07)

− 0.52***

(0.08)

− 0.52***

(0.08)

Implementation

− 0.52***

(0.07)

− 0.53***

(0.07)

− 0.53***

(0.07)

− 0.47***

(0.08)

− 0.47***

(0.08)

Legal profession

− 0.10

(0.13)

− 0.13

(0.10)

− 0.02

(0.13)

− 0.02

(0.13)

Analysis # Legal profession

− 0.06

(0.15)

− 0.06

(0.15)

Selection # Legal profession

− 0.08

(0.13)

− 0.08

(0.13)

Implementation # Legal profession

− 0.29**

(0.15)

− 0.29**

(0.15)

R-squared 0.05 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.26
Demographics N Y Y Y N
Additional controls N Y Y Y N
Respondent FE N N N N Y
Number of observations 1067 984 984 984 984

This table presents OLS results. The dependent variable is the LOA perceived as most fair by the respondent. Demographics are: Female, Age, Age-squared, Legal Profession, and Court Experience. Additional Controls are Knowledge in Tech, Trust in Tech, Personal Innovativeness, and Compatibility. The reference category for the stage is information acquisition. Standard errors are clustered by respondent. *p < 0.1 **p < 0.05 ***p < 0.01