Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 1;77:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.10.010

Table 1.

Population Size Estimates of the diagnosed PLWH population under Alameda County, CA, public health jurisdiction from the best fitting Identifiable Models, 2013

Model N^ 95% CI AIC df*
Base 5,943 5,867 – 6,023 974.5 10
Base + L1*L3 5,891 5,820 – 5,965 715.1 9
Base + L1*L3 + L2*L3 5,846 5,780 – 5,915 485.8 8
Base + L1*L3 + L2*L3 + L3*L4 5,684 5,625 – 5,747 417.7 7
Base + L1*L3 + L1*L4 + L2*L3 + L2*L4 6,198 6,069 – 6,338 391.2 6
Base + L1*L3 + L1*L4 + L2*L3 + L2*L4 + L3*L4 7,543 6,270 – 11,026 387.4 5
Base + L1*L3 + L1*L4 + L3*L4 + L1*L3*L4 + L2*L3 + L2*L4 10,234 6,739 – 30,225 382.75 4
Base + L1*L3 + L1*L4 + L3*L4 + L1*L3*L4 + L2*L3 + L2*L4 + L3*L4 + L2*L3*L4 1.113e10 8,062 – 3.339e10 379.9 3
*

Degrees of freedom remaining. Selected models are the best-fitting model (lowest AIC) within strata of models with equivalent degrees of freedom remaining (e.g., among the log-linear models with nine degrees of freedom remaining, models where only one interaction term is included along with the Base parameters, the model with the L1*L3 interaction had the lowest AIC).

Base= main terms corresponding to each individual list (not including list interactions); L1= List 1; L2= List 2; L3= List 3; L4= List 4

N^= estimated population size