Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;24:1. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00452-1

Table 2.

Comparison of open gingival embrasures between the non-occurrence and occurrence groups in the mandible

Variables Non-occurrence (N = 74) Occurrence (N = 51) P value
Age, years 24.5 ± 7.3 26.4 ± 5.6 0.113
Treatment duration, months 27.1 ± 12.5 28.1 ± 12.0 0.692
Gender 0.374
    Female 61 (82.4) 45 (88.2)
    Male 13 (17.6) 6 (11.8)
Malocclusion 0.864
    Class I 37 (50.0) 28 (54.9)
    Class II 30 (40.5) 18 (35.3)
    Class III 7 (9.5) 5 (9.8)
IPR in anterior teeth 0.199
    0 mm 29 (39.2) 18 (35.3)
    0–2 mm 17 (23.0) 19 (37.3)
     ≥ 2 mm 28 (37.8) 14 (27.5)
IPR in incisors 0.683
    0 mm 34 (45.9) 21 (41.2)
    0–1 mm 18 (24.3) 16 (31.4)
    ≥ 1 mm 22 (29.7) 14 (27.5)
IPR in central incisors 0.653
    0 mm 42 (56.8) 31 (60.8)
     > 0 mm 32 (43.2) 20 (39.2)
Attachments in anterior teeth 0.021*
    0a 13 (17.6) 1 (2.0)
    1-2b 29 (39.2) 21 (41.2)
     > 2b 32 (43.2) 29 (56.9)
Attachments in incisors 0.222
    0 45 (60.8) 31 (60.8)
    1–2 25 (33.8) 13 (25.5)
     > 2 4 (5.4) 7 (13.7)
Attachments in central incisors 0.022*
    0a 66 (89.2) 40 (78.4)
    1a 7 (9.5) 4 (7.8)
    2b 1 (1.4) 7 (13.7)

Data are given as mean ± SD or N (%)

IPR interproximal enamel reduction

P value < 0.05 was considered significant (*) given in Bold