Table 3.
Phenotypic antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella serovars from boxes of hatchlings in Nigeria.
| Serovar | N | Number of isolates resistant to antimicrobials |
MDR* | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP | GEN | KAN | CTX | CIP | SUL | TET | CHL | TMP | NAL | MEM | N | ||
| Chomedey | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Haelsingborg | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Isangi | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Ituri | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Kentucky | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Larochelle | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Menston | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mississippi | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Muenster | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Nigeria | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Stanleyville | 7 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Takoradi | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Virchow | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 7 | 18 | 30 | 10 | 22 | 22 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 22 | 3 | 22 |
Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CTX, cefotaxim; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamicin; MEM, meropenem; NAL, nalidixic acid; SUL, sulfonamides; TET, tetracycline; TMP, trimethoprim. *MDR, multidrug resistance.