Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec;11(12):1762–1770. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-174

Table 1. Outcomes of metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening gender affirming surgery.

First author Publication year N LOF (m) One stage, n (%) Standing to pee, n (%) Phallic length, Avg cm [SD] Wound complication, n (%) Stricture, n (%) Fistula, n (%) Mucocele, n (%)
Al-Tamimi 2018 12 24 NR NR 7 [5–10.5] NR NR 1 (8%) NR
Bizic 2019 793* NR 793 (100%) 793 (100%) 5.6 [4–10] NR 11 (1%) 70 (9%) **96 (12%)
Perovic 2003 22 48 22 (100%) NR 5.7 [4–10] NR 2 (9%) 3 (14%) NR
Takamatsu 2009 33 30 33 (100%) 16 (48%) NR 9 (27%) 6 (18%) 14 (42%) NR
Van de Grift 2017 2 32 2 (100%) NR NR 2 (100%) 2 (33%) 0 (0%) NR
Veerman 2020 8 23 NR NR NR NR 5 (63%) 4 (50%) 1 (1%)
***Avg 146 28 81% 74% 6 63% 25% 21% 6%

*, 791 or >99% had colpectomy; **, two patients in series had no vaginectomy performed; ***, Avg of reported study outcomes. NR, not reported; LOF, length of follow up; mo, months; Avg, average; SD, standard deviation.