Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Diabet Med. 2019 Dec 20;37(2):319–325. doi: 10.1111/dme.14189

Table 3.

Mixed effects regression models estimating associations between intervention and participation on change in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c (mmol/mol)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Effect B(95%CI) SE P B(95% CI) SE P B(95% CI) SE P

Adapted-Family −5 (−10, −1) 2.3 0.029 2 (−5, 9) 3.5 0.633 −2 (−8, 5) 3.4 0.655
Exposure −1 (−2, 0) 0.4 0.013 −1 (−1, 0) 0.3 0.046
Age −0 (0, 0) 0.1 0.254
Male 1 (−4, 6) 2.5 0.645
Married 0 (−5, 5) 2.6 0.995
Employed 0 (−5, 5) 2.6 0.953
Education 1 (−2, 3) 1.6 0.376
Medication −3 (−7, 2) 2.4 0.279

Change in HbA1c (%)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Effect B(95%CI) SE P B(95% CI) SE P B(95% CI) SE P

Adapted-Family −0.5 (−0.9, −0.1) 0.21 0.029 0.2 (−0.5, 0.8) 0.32 0.633 −0.1 (−0.8, 0.5) 0.31 0.655
Exposure −0.1 (−0.2, 0.0) 0.04 0.013 −0.1 (−0.1, 0.0) 0.03 0.046
Age −0.0 (−0.0, 0.0) 0.01 0.254
Male 0.1 (−0.3, 0.6) 0.23 0.645
Married 0.0 (−0.5, 0.5) 0.24 0.995
Employed 0.0 (−0.5, 0.5) 0.24 0.953
Education 0.1 (−0.2, 0.3) 0.15 0.376
Medication −0.2 (−0.7, 0.2) 0.22 0.279

Statistically significant P values are bolded (p<0.05). DSME, diabetes self-management education; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; SE=standard error.

Adjusted for baseline HbA1c.