Abstract
The salt calcium chloride (CaCl2) is widely used in industry as a food additive; levels for human consumption are regulated by international or governmental agencies. Generally, the food industry relies on toxicity studies conducted in mammals such as mice, rats, and rabbits for determining food safety. However, testing in mammals is time-consuming and expensive. Zebrafish have been used in a range of toxicological analyses and offer advantages with regard to sensitivity, time, and cost. However, information in not available with regard to whether the sensitivity of zebrafish to CaCl2 is comparable to the concentrations of CaCl2 used as food additives. The aim of this study was to compare the CaCl2 tolerance of zebrafish embryos and larvae with concentrations currently approved as food additives. Acute toxicity, embryotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and neurotoxicity assays were used to determine the threshold toxic concentration of CaCl2 in zebrafish embryos and larvae. The data showed that doses above 0.4% had toxic effects on development and on the activity of the cardiac and neuronal systems. Furthermore, all embryos exposed to 0.8 and 1.6% of CaCl2 died after 24 hpf. These findings are consistent with the limits of CaCl2 concentrations approved by Codex Alimentarius. Therefore, zebrafish embryos could be suitable for screening food additives.
Abbreviations: bw, body weight; CaCl2, calcium chloride; ESFA, European Food Safety Authority; FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; hpf, hours postfertilization; mpf, minutes postfertilization; WHO, World Health Organization
Introduction
Calcium chloride (CaCl2) is a white powder with a molecular weight of 111 g; it is odorless and highly water soluble. CaCl2 is used widely in food manufacturing for products such as bread, potato snacks, dairy products, beverages, juices, coffee, tea, condiments, jams, meat products, and more. Fruit is often immersed in a water solution of CaCl2 to aid in preservation. The use of CaCl2 in food and nutritional supplement formulations is due to its stabilizing, thickening, and texturizing properties.13,29,33
Food additives and supplements for human and nonhuman consumption musts be manufactured with adherence to specific product specifications and quality standards in order to optimize quality and safety for users. Baseline product quality specifications are defined by the Codex Alimentarius Commission under the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). One of the main purposes of the Codex is to protect the health of consumers and to provide a benchmark standard for many nations, particularly those that do not yet have their own food standards. Other governmental or international organizations also base their legislation on the Codex Alimentarius, including the European Food Safety Authority (ESFA) in the European Union and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States of America. For example, the FDA legislation establishes that the maximum level of CaCl2 in food should be 0.1% for commercial jams and jellies, 0.2% for cheese and processed fruit and fruit juices, 0.2% for gravies and sauces, 0.22% for nonalcoholic beverages, 0.25% for meat products, 0.3% for baked and dairy products, 0.32% for coffee and tea, 0.4% for condiments and relishes, 0.4% for processed vegetables and vegetable juices; 2% for plant protein products, and 0.05% for all other food categories.7
Generally, the food industry relies on toxicity studies and levels of tolerance that are determined based on testing in animals such as mice, rats, and rabbits. The current study similarly tested zebrafish (Danio rerio) because it has high genetic similarity with humans, and the embryo’s transparency in the development phase allows real-time analysis. However, a disadvantage of using zebrafish is the absence of current supporting legislation. Therefore, standards for use of this species should be developed by the scientific community, governmental and nongovernmental, public, and private entities.
The goal of the present study was to analyze the effects of permitted concentrations of CaCl2 on zebrafish embryogenesis. We focused on cardiac and nervous system development in order to determine whether the published limits were safe for use in zebrafish. A zebrafish model could provide the basis for the development of a toxicological screening methodology that could be used before testing food preparations in other, costlier models.
Materials and Methods
The project was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Carlos under Ref. 5085180319. CaCl2 was purchased from a commercial supplier (Adicel Indústria e Comércio LTDA, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) and its toxicologic profile was tested using major endpoint requirements as required by the FDA, including assessment of acute embryotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and neurotoxicity.
A total of 410 zebrafish embryos and larvae were supplied by the Central Vivarium of the Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil. Breeders were kept on automated racks at 28 °C (82.4 °F) at a pH 7.0 under a photoperiod of 14 h of light: 10 h of darkness, and were fed a commercial feed brand (Gemma for Zebrafish, USA) twice a day. Breeder were housed in a single fish tank overnight at a ratio of 2 males to one female. Embryos were collected the next morning at about 10 min post fertilization (mpf). At 60 mpf, the embryos were selected based on the observation of cell division under a microscope. CaCl2 tests were conducted only when the fertilization rate was 90% or above. CaCl2 embryotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and neurotoxicity were tested using concentrations of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.6% (Table 1).
Table 1.
Concentration of CaCl2 used in this study
Concentrations (CaCl2: mw = 110.984) | ||
---|---|---|
% | mM | ug/mL |
0.1% | 9.01 | 1,000 |
0.2% | 18.02 | 2,000 |
0.4% | 36.04 | 4,000 |
0.8% | 72.08 | 8,000 |
1.6% | 144.16 | 16,000 |
Embryotoxicity.
To assess acute toxicity, OECD Guideline 236 establishes that 200 individuals should be screened for each compound.27 Embryos at 1.5 h post fertilization (hpf) were exposed to 5 logarithmic concentrations of CaCl2 for 96 h in individualized 96-well plates. The viability of the embryos was assessed daily (6, 24, 28, 72 and 96hpf) based on the observation of lethality indicators such as embryo coagulation, absence of detachment of the yolk sac tail, changes in the formation of somites, and absence of heartbeat.27 Developmental alterations were observed at 5.6 hpf; these changes included absence of epiboly, failure to hatch, swim bladder insufflation, and changes in brain, eye, heart, ear and spine.18 Changes in the development of the embryos were recorded daily for evaluation of teratogeny. All tests were evaluated against a negative control group (Embryonic medium E3, n = 25), a CaCl2 plate control (Embryonic medium E3, n = 4), a positive control group (3.4 dichloroaniline - 4 mg L−1, n = 25) and a solvent control group (1% DMSO, n = 25).
Cardiotoxicity.
One of the most used parameters to evaluate the cardiotoxicity in Zebrafish larvae is heart rate and its dispersion interval (standard deviation), which can be measured by recording the dynamics of cardiac movement under microscopy. However, given the complexity of changes that cardiotoxic compounds can produce in the normal activity of the heart, we suspected that the quantification of these parameters might not be sufficiently predictive to identify cardiotoxic effects of some compounds, especially at low concentrations. Therefore, we used several parameters to measure the variation in cardiac cycles that were obtained from sequential images of an electrocardiogram that was captured on video and used to characterize cardiac Kymograph movement (Figure 1). To do this, we developed a computational algorithm in Python that captured the temporal sequence of the ventricular wall movement and quantified a series of linear and nonlinear parameters associated with the intensity and variability of the heart rate.
Figure 1.
Parameters used to characterize the dynamics of cardiac movement.
To assess cardiotoxicity, 60 zebrafish larvae were exposed at 96 hpf to one of 3 different concentrations of CACl2 for 4 h (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4%). After that, using recorded videos of 50 frames per second and CardioCount V3 (in-house Python software, Laboratory of Applied Immunology, UFSCar, São Carlos Brazil), we measured variables associated with cardiac frequency and rhythm, including heart rate, Poincaré (SD1, SD2, SD1/SD2, S) and entropy (sample, bubble, SVD, approximate, and spectral)30 and characterized the dynamics of cardiac movement (Figure 1). All cardiac parameters were normalized against the DMSO means and standard deviation values (Z-Score).
Neurotoxicity.
We assessed spontaneous movement at 24 hpf to evaluate neurotoxic effects. We followed the design used in another study25 that screened 150 individuals. At 10 mpf, embryos were exposed to 3 base 2 logarithmic dilutions of CaCl2 (n = 30) and one negative group control (DMSO 1%) for 24 h. The spontaneous movement of the embryos was captured over a period of 6 min by using a digital camera attached to an optical microscope. For each embryo, the number of spontaneous movements per minute were counted using the EspMovCont, an in-house Python software (Laboratory of Applied Immunology, UFSCar, São Carlos Brazil). Movements were counted beginning at 60 s after filming began, which provided 5 min of movement counting.
Statistical analysis.
Group comparisons of cardiac (Z-Scores) and neurotoxicity variables were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis statistical test and the Dunn analysis for the posthoc assessment,31 with all groups compared with medium group (G1). Results of the univariate analyzes of the cardiac variables could be visualized in boxplot graphs. The data were also analyzed using multivariate tests to identify differences that could not be found by univariate statistical analyses. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) was used to reduce all cardiac parameters to 2 components, LDA1 and LDA2, which were used to visualize clustering patterns. The cluster map shows the patterns, the correlations of the variables, and the proximity associations between the groups. Multiclass Logistic Regression analysis was used to build the mathematical model that quantified the probability of larval cardiotoxicity. Compounds were considered cardiotoxic when the mean value of the probability of normality of the larvae of the respective group, analyzed by the t-student test (1 sample), was statistically lower than 0.5. The difference between survival curves were analyzed by the Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) Test with p-values corrected by the Bonferroni method. The software used was the Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) Dose–response curves were plotted and analyzed by Probit Regression using the MedCal 19.8 software (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). P values of < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
The acute toxicity assessment showed that embryos exposed to CaCl2 concentrations above 0.8% had significantly more deaths than did the DMSO control group. The cumulative mortality for each concentration was 100% of survival for 0.1, 0.2 nd 0.3% at 96 hpf, and 100% of mortality for 0.8 and 1.6% at 24 hpf (Figure 2). No abnormalities were observed with 0.1 to 0.4%, although 0.8 and 1.6% were associated with abnormalities that included absence of epiboly, failure to hatch, swim bladder insufflation, and changes in brain, eye, heart, ear and spine in 100% of animals at 24 hpf. The LC50% at 96 h was 0.35%. No deaths occurred in the control groups, and no incidents that may have influenced the results occurred during the tests. Survival and teratogenic effects (abnormalities) and photos of groups in different concentrations are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.
Figure 2.
(A) Percentage survival and death of embryos exposed to CaCl2 at 96 hpf, compared with the DMSO control; (B) Dose-response curves showing the percentages of abnormalities or death at 96 h after treatment with each concentration (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6%) of CaCl2. The Log-rank Statistical Test (Mantel-Cox) was performed to compare all groups with the DMSO control. The P values were corrected by the Bonferroni methodology and considered significant for values P < 0.001. The blue line represents the fit model of dead embryos calculated by Probit Regression (R2 = 0.865, P < 0.0001) and its 95% confidence interval (IC95) (dashed blue line) calculated by Medcalc.
Figure 3.
(A) Embryos exposed at 1.6% of CaCl2 showing the absence of epiboly (embryonic maldevelopment) at 5.3 hpf; (B) Embryos exposed at 5.3 hpf to 0.8% of CaCl2 showing absence of epiboly; (C) Embryos exposed at 5.3 hpf to up to 0.4% of CaCl2, showing standard development, with the gastrula period at 50% epiboly; (D) Larvae exposed at 120 hpf showing standard development at concentrations up to 0.4% CaCl2.
The highest tested concentration of CaCl2 used to assess cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity was the LC50% (0.35%). Neither the heart rate (HR, RR) nor the variability of heart rate (SDHR) showed differences between the control groups DMSO and CaCl2 groups. Variables associated with arrhythmia (Poincaré: SD1, SD2, SD1/SD2, S; Entropy: sample, bubble, SVD, approximate, and spectral) of the CaCl2 groups also failed to show elevation of the heart rate as compared with the control DMSO group, indicating absence of arrhythmia. The Heatmap (right side, Figure 4) shows the results of using the Dunn test to compare the groups analyzed in pairs. The values on the Heatmap represent the ×100 significance level. Values lower than 5.0% were considered significant. Cardiac parameters including heart rate, SD1, SD2, Sd1/SD2, bubble, SVD, and approximate and spectral entropies of the CaCl2 groups were normalized to those of the DMSO group. The effects in the 0.4% CaCl2 group were highly variable, and differences were not statistically significant. None of the zebrafish larvae groups had significant differences in measures of cardiac activity at 96 hpf when exposed for 4 h to CaCl2 as compared with larvae exposed to DMSO.
Figure 4.
(A) Boxplot graphs of the distribution of relative levels of variables normalized in relation to medium; (B) The multivariable methodology of LDA Analysis accompanied by the Student T Test; (C) Clustermap showing the results of the cluster analysis.
Spontaneous movement was analyzed in embryos exposed at 24 hpf to DMSO or treated CaCl2 (Figure 5). The analysis showed that spontaneous movement during exposure to 0.1 and 0.2% were not significantly different from those of the negative control group, with an average number of movements of 7.20 and 7.15, respectively. Exposure to 0.4% was associated with an average movement score of 5.17.
Figure 5.
Means values ± SEM of the number of spontaneous movements per minute of Danio rerio embryos exposed at 24 hpf to different CaCl2 concentrations.
Discussion
CaCl2 has a low molecular weight and high water solubility and is thus rapidly dissociated in water into calcium and chloride ions, which are efficiently absorbed by the intestine. Once absorbed, calcium and chloride ions are regulated separately. These 2 ions are essential constituents of all animal species.13 Calcium is the most abundant metallic element in all animal species, located mostly in the skeleton, and is essential for the formation and maintenance of bones and teeth. It also regulates several important physiologic functions, such as blood coagulation, bone mineralization, neuromuscular activity, enzymatic activity, and acid-base balance. In humans, hormonal systems regulate plasma calcium concentrations at approximately 100 µg/mL by controlling the intestinal absorption of dietary calcium, release of calcium from bone, and renal absorption and excretion. Chloride is the most abundant anion in animals and is important for maintaining osmotic and acid–base balance; most of the chloride is located in extracellular fluids. Plasma concentrations in humans are 3.6 to 3.9 mg/mL.13
Zebrafish embryos are excellent organisms for testing pharmacological and food compounds because they are permeable to small molecules and drugs during organogenesis. This feature simplifies drug administration and vital dye staining because embryos have already formed most of their organs by 96 hpf.16 However, little information is available on CaCl2 toxicity in zebrafish.
In mice, the Lethal Dose 50% (LD50) values were 2,045 mg/kg body weight (bw) (0.20%) in male mice and 1,940 mg/kg bw (0.19%) in female mice.1 In rats, oral LD50 values were 3,798 mg/kg bw (0.38%) jn males and 4,179 mg/kg bw (4.42%) in females.1 Thus, rats required almost twice the concentration than did mice. Furthermore, the oral LD50 for rats was approximately 5,000 mg/kg bw (0.5%),5 whereas in dogs it was over 2,000 mg/kg bw (0.2%).22 In acute oral toxicity studies in rabbits, oral LD50 values for CaCl2 ranged from 500 to 1,000 mg/kg/bw; gross postmortem examination revealed perforation and severe ulceration in the stomach of dead rabbits.19
A series of developmental toxicity studies examined the effects of CaCl2 on embryo lethality and teratogenicity in mice, rats, and rabbits.7 The highest doses of CaCl2 used were 189 mg/kg body weight/day (or 0.02%) for mice, 176 mg/kg/day (0.02%) for rats, and 169 mg/kg/day (0.02%) for rabbits.8 These doses were much lower than those used in our current study. The mouse, rat and rabbit studies found no effects on maternal or fetal development or survival, and no differences were found in the number of soft tissue or skeletal abnormalities between treated and control animals, leading to the conclusion that CaCl2 at these doses did not produce toxic effects on development.8
In our study of zebrafish, the lethal concentration (LC)50 of CaCl2 was 0.35% or 3,533 mg/kg, and at doses above 0.8%, or the equivalent of 8,000 mg/kg, all embryos died. Similar results were presented previously for mice, rats, and rabbits 1,5,19,22 (Table 2). However, a few articles in the literature discuss zebrafish and CaCl2 toxicology, as shown in the table.17
Table 2.
Benchmarks of LD50 in zebrafish, mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs.
Animal | Sex | Lethal Dose (50%) | (%) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mice | Male | 2045 mg/kg/bw | 0.2 | Akatsuka et al., 1977, as cited in OECD 20021 |
Female | 1940 mg/kg bw | 0.19 | Akatsuka et al., 1977, as cited in OECD 20021 | |
Rats | Male | 3798 mg/kg/bw | 0.38 | Akatsuka et al., 1977, as cited in OECD 20021 |
Female | 4179 mg/kg/bw | 0.42 | Akatsuka et al., 1977, as cited in OECD 20021 | |
Rats | --------- | 5000mg/kg/bw | 0.5 | Barnes and Eltherington, 1964, as cited in SCOGS-45, 19755 |
Rabbits | --------- | 500–1000mg/kg/bw | 0.05-0.1 | Koopman & Pot, 198619 |
Dogs | --------- | 2000 mg/kg/bw | 0.2 | Mahorner, 1937, as cited in SCOGS-45, 197522 |
Zebrafish | --------- | 3533mg/kg | 0.35 | Present study |
In a previous study, incubation of zebrafish embryos in 1 mM CaCl2 (0.11 mg/kg, or less than 0.0001%) did not cause developmental morbidity or mortality at 120 hpf.17 The same study determined, by titration approach, that 62.5 μM CaCl2 was low sufficient to permit a normal development up to 120 hpf,17 but these concentrations were lower when compared with those used in this and other studies1,5,19,22 (Table 1 and 2).
At the present study, concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% CaCl2 produced no significant differences in cardiotoxicity as compared with the control group. However, all embryos exposed to concentrations of 0.8 and 1.6% died after 96hpf, so cardiotoxicity could not be assessed. Neurotoxicity testing was performed at 24 hpf using concentrations of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4%. The effects of 0.1 and 0.2% were the same as those of the negative control group. However, the effects of 0.4% were significantly different from control. At concentrations of 0.8% and 1.6%, all embryos had died before the scheduled test and therefore could not be evaluated.
The results of our study support the use of zebrafish embryos for testing exposure to the CaCL2 concentrations present in foods as established in the FDA Codex Alimentarius, with maximum concentrations of 0.4%. Nonetheless, chemical interactions that might occur during processing could further reduce the CaCl2 concentration in the final product before the time of consumption. We suggest that zebrafish embryos can be used to prioritize chemical testing in mammalian species with the ultimate goal of protecting human health. In this way, the time and costs of the safety assessment of new food compounds could be substantially reduced. The potential of the zebrafish embryo for food toxicity testing is already known,2 but regulatory agencies do not yet generally encourage or accept its use. Such acceptance would require additional studies to standardize zebrafish protocols and strains.3,10
In conclusion, numerous studies have documented similarities in the toxicity profiles of zebrafish and mammals. Because test compounds can be dissolved in water and zebrafish embryos and larvae absorb through their skin, gut, and gills, using zebrafish can simplify food safety assessments can simplify the process. Also, because fish embryos are very sensitive to acute, chronic, and other harmful toxins, biologic testing technologies based on fish embryos can quickly and comprehensively determine the overall safety of food ingredients and products.6 The current study verified the acute toxicity of CaCl2 in zebrafish during embryogenesis with regard to mortality, teratogenic effects, and cardiac and neural system development using a real-time analysis. Our study found that the limits allowed by international legislation were safe for zebrafish embryos. We demonstrated the value of this species in toxicologic screening and its likely applicability to toxic effects in humans. Although more studies are necessary to develop food safety indices based on zebrafish, we expect that our study can provide a basis for the development of a toxicologic screening methodology for use prior to the testing in other animals.
References
- 1.Akatsuka K, Hashimoto T, Takeuchi K. 1977. Pharmacological studies on Ca meso- tartrate I. Acute and subacute toxicity tests. Ouyou-Yakuri 14:963–75. (in Japanese) (as cited in OECD Screening Information Database Set, 2002). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bailone RL, Aguiar LKD, Roca RDO, Borra RC, Corrêa T, Janke H, Fukushima HCS. 2019. Zebrafish as an animal model for food safety research: trends in the animal research. Food Biotechnol 33:283–302. 10.1080/08905436.2019.1673173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bailone RL, Fukushima HCS, de Aguiar LK, Borra RC. 2022. The endocannabinoid system in zebrafish and its potential to study the effects of Cannabis in humans. Lab Anim Res 38:5. 10.1186/s42826-022-00116-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bailone RL, Fukushima HCS, Ventura Fernandes BH, De Aguiar LK, Corrêa T, Janke H, Grejo Setti P, Roça RO, Borra RC. 2020. Zebrafish as an alternative animal model in human and animal vaccination research. Lab Anim Res 36:13. 10.1186/s42826-020-00042-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barnes CD, Eltherington LG. 1964. Drug dosage in laboratory animals. A handbook. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. (As cited in SCOGS-45. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) Database, SCOGS-45. 1975. Evaluation of the health aspects of certain calcium salts as food ingredients). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ducharme NA, Reif DM, Gustafsson JA, Bondesson M. 2015. Comparison of toxicity values across zebrafish early life stages and mammalian studies: Implications for chemical testing. Reprod Toxicol 55:3–10. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Food Drug Administration . 2020. [Internet]. CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. V.3. CITE: 21CFR184.1193. [Cited 19 August 2021]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=184.1193
- 8.Food and Drug Research Laboratories. 1974. Teratologic evaluation of FDA 71-87 (calcium chloride) in mice, rats and rabbits. Report No. FDABF-GRAS-251. NTIS PB-234879. Cited in https://www.industrialchemicals.gov.au/sites/default/files/Calcium%20chloride%20%28CaCl2%29_Human%20health%20tier%20II%20assessment.pdf [Cited 22 November 2021].
- 9.Fujita H, Sasaki M. 1987. Mutagenicity test of food additives with Salmonella typhimurium TA97 and TA102 (II). Ann Rep Tokyo Metr Res Lab Publ Health 38:423–430 [Article in Japanese]. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fukushima HCS, Bailone RL, Corrêa T, Janke H, De Aguiar LK, Setti PG, Borra RC. 2021. Zebrafish toxicological screening could aid Leishmaniosis drug discovery. Lab Anim Res 37:27. 10.1186/s42826-021-00104-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guzik P, Piskorski J, Krauze T, Schneider R, Wesseling KH, Wykretowicz A, Wysocki H. 2007. Correlations between Poincaré plot and conventional heart rate variability parameters assessed during paced breathing. J Physiol Sci 57:63–71. 10.2170/physiolsci.RP005506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hsu CH, Tsai MY, Huang GS, Lin TC, Chen KP, Ho ST, Shyu LY, Li CY. 2012. Poincaré plot indexes of heart rate variability detect dynamic autonomic modulation during general anesthesia induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 50:12–18. 10.1016/j.aat.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Inventory Multi-tiered Assessment and Prioritization. 2020. [Internet]. Calcium chloride (CaCl2): Human health tier II assessment. Accelerated Assessment of Industrial Chemicals in Australia. [Cited 18 August 2021]. Available at: https://www.industrialchemicals.gov.au/sites/default/files/Calcium%20chloride%20%28CaCl2%29_Human%20health%20tier%20II%20assessment.pdf
- 14.Ishidate M JR, Sofumi T, Yoshikawa K, Hayashi M, Nohmi T, Sawada M, Matsuoka A. 1984. Primary mutagenicity screening of food additives currently used in Japan. Food Chem Toxicol 22:623–636. 10.1016/0278-6915(84)90271-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kanematsu N, Hara M, Kada T. 1980. Rec assay and mutagenicity studies on metal compounds. Mutat Res 77:109–116. 10.1016/0165-1218(80)90127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kari G, Rodeck U, Dicker AP. 2007. Zebrafish: an emerging model system for human disease and drug discovery. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:70–80. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim KT, Tanguay RL. 2014. The role of chorion on toxicity of silver nanoparticles in the embryonic zebrafish assay. Environ Health Toxicol 29:e2014021. 10.5620/eht.e2014021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. 1995. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203:253–310. 10.1002/aja.1002030302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Koopman TSM, Pot TE. 1986. Acute oral toxicity study with anhydrous calcium chloride in male rabbits. Duphar Report No.56645/52/86.
- 20.Lake DE, Richman JS, Griffin MP, Moorman JR. 2002. Sample entropy analysis of neonatal heart rate variability. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283:R789–R797. 10.1152/ajpregu.00069.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li S, Yang M, Li C, Cai P. 2008. Analysis of heart rate variability based on singular value decomposition entropy. J Shanghai Univ 12:433–437. 10.1007/s11741-008-0511-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mahorner HR. 1937. Experimental production of goiter. Archives of Surgery 35:937–955 (as cited in SCOGS-45. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) Database, SCOGS-45. 1975. Evaluation of the health aspects of certain calcium salts as food ingredients). 10.1001/archsurg.1937.01190170106009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Manis G, Aktaruzzaman MD, Sassi R. 2017. Bubble entropy: An entropy almost free of parameters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64:2711–2718. 10.1109/TBME.2017.2664105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Manis G, Sassi R. 2017. Tolerance to spikes: A comparison of sample and Bubble entropy. Comput Cardiol 44:1–4. 10.22489/CinC.2017.378-384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Menelaou E, Husbands EE, Pollet RG, Coutts CA, Ali DW, Svoboda KR. 2008. Embryonic motor activity and implications for regulating motoneuron axonal pathfinding in zebrafish. Eur J Neurosci 28:1080–1096. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06418.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Olivier PH, Marzin D. 1987. Study of the genotoxic potential of 48 inorganic derivatives with the SOS chromotest. Mutat Res 189:263–269. 10.1016/0165-1218(87)90057-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. [Internet]. 236: Fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) test. Guide l (Test. Chem. Sect. 2), p 1–22. [Cited 05 May 2021]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/36817070.pdf
- 28.Richman JS, Moorman JR. 2000. Physiological Time-Series Analysis Using Approximate Entropy and Sample Entropy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278:H2039–H2049. 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanches AG, da Silva MB, Moreira EGS, dos Santos EX, Tripoloni FM. 2017. Extensão da vida útil de pitangas submetidas ao tratamento com cloreto de cálcio. Acta Iguazu 6:45–58 [Article in Portuguese]. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. 2017. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health 5:258. 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Social Science Statistics. 2021. [Internet, Cited 15 November 2021]. Available at: https://www.socscistatistics.com/
- 32.Staniczenko PPA, Lee CF, Jones NS. 2009. Rapidly detecting disorder in rhythmic biological signals: A spectral entropy measure to identify cardiac arrhythmias. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 79:011915. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.011915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vasconcelos LHC, da Silva FA, Nascimento LM, Vasconcelos RF. 2020. Avaliação pós-colheita de tangerinas ‘ekopon’ tangerins submitted to the application of calcium chloride in pre-harvest]. Res Soc Dev 9:e132963638. [Article in Portuguese]. 10.33448/rsd-v9i6.3638 [DOI] [Google Scholar]