Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 10;18(5):1107–1117. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.355816

STROBE Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of case-control studies

Item No Recommendation Check
Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract Page1

(b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found Page 3

Introduction
Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported Page4

Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses Page4

Methods

Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper Page5

Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection Page5

Participants 6 (a) Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of case ascertainment and control selection. Give the rationale for the choice of cases and controls Page5

(b) For matched studies, give matching criteria and the number of controls per case Page5

Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable Page5-6

Data sources/measurement 8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group Page6

Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias NA

Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at NA

Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and why Page 13

Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding Page13-14

(b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions Page13-14

(c) Explain how missing data were addressed NA

(d) If applicable, explain how matching of cases and controls was addressed NA

(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses NA

Results

Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analysed Page14-15

(b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage NA

(c) Consider use of a flow diagram flow chart Attachment

Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) and information on exposures and potential confounders Page 14-15

(b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest NA

Outcome data 15* Report numbers in each exposure category, or summary measures of exposure Page14-15

Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder- adjusted estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval).
Make clear which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included
Page 14-15

(b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized NA

(c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk for a meaningful time period NA


Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and sensitivity analyses NA

Discussion

Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives Page 20

Limitations 19 Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias Page 22

Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence Page 22

Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results NA

Other information

Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based Page1

*Give information separately for cases and controls.

Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is available at http://www.strobe-statement.org.