Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 11;112(6):1303–1317. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2748

Table 1.

Studies included in systematic review and meta‐analysis

PMID Title Author and year Trial registration Study design Sample size (n) Primary end point (weeks) Age, years Female (%) Ancestry (% European) Eligibility Baseline depressive symptom score/number of failed medications Scale (remission definition) Target genes References
23,047,243 Using a PGx algorithm to guide the treatment of depression Hall‐Flavin 2012 N/A Open‐label, controlled 44 8 PGx = 43; TAU = 42 PGx = 54; TAU = 54 “The subjects almost exclusively identified themselves to be of European ancestry.” 25–70 years MDD by DSM‐IV HAM‐D17 ≥ 14 baseline

QIDS‐C16

PGx = 16.0; TAU = 15.4 PGx = 4.4; TAU = 4.4

HAM‐D17 (not reported) CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, HTR2A, SLC6A4 [22]
24,018,772 Utility of integrated PGx testing to support the treatment of MDD in a psychiatric outpatient setting Hall‐Flavin 2013 NCT01610063 Open‐label, controlled 165 8 PGx = 41; TAU = 44 PGx = 69; TAU = 77 “…almost exclusively European ancestry of the participants, …” 18–72 years MDD by DSM‐IV HAM‐D17 ≥ 14 baseline

HAM‐D17

PGx = 23.0; TAU = 22.5

PGx = 3.6; TAU = 4.7

HAM‐D17 (≤ 7) CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, HTR2A, SLC6A4 [23]
24,229,738 A prospective, randomized, double‐blind study assessing the clinical impact of integrated pharmacogenomic testing for MDD Winner 2013 NCT01261364 Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 49 10 PGx = 51; TAU = 48 PGx = 69; TAU = 92

PGx = 96;

TAU = 100

Age ≥ 18 years depression based on interview HAM‐D17 score ≥ 14

PGx = NA; TAU = NA

PGx = 2.9; TAU = 2.7

HAM‐D17 (≤7) CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, SLC6A4, HTR2A [24]
26,243,841 Improved antidepressant remission in major depression via a Pharmacokinetic Pathway Polygene Pharmacogenetic Report Singh 2015 ACTRN12613001135707 Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 128 12 PGx = 44; TAU = 44 PGx = 58; TAU = 61 PGx = 100; TAU = 100 Age ≥ 18 years MDD by DSM‐V HAM‐D17 score ≥ 18

HAM‐D17

PGx = 24.8 TAU = 24.7

PGx = NA; TAU = NA

HAM‐D17 (≤ 7) CYP2C19, CYP2D6, UGT1A1 ABCB1, ABCC1 [25]
28,705,252 Efficacy of prospective PGx testing in the treatment of MDD: results of a randomized, double‐blind clinical trial Perez 2017 NCT02529462 Blinded (participant) RCT 280 12 PGx = 52; TAU = 51 PGx = 64; TAU = 63

PGx = 91;

TAU = 94

Age ≥ 18 years MDD by DSM‐IV‐TR CGI‐S ≥ 4 new to treatment or inadequately controlled

HAM‐D17

PGx = 19.5; TAU = 19.0

PGx = NA; TAU = NA

HAM‐D17 (≤7) CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, ABCB1, AKT1, BDNF, CACNG2, CES1, COMT, CRHR1, DDIT4, DRD3, EPHX1, FCHSD1, GRIK2, GRIK4, HLA‐A, HTR1A, HTR2A, HTR2C, LPHN3, NEFM, OPRM1, RGS4, RPTOR, SLC6A4, UGT2B15 [26]
28,992,526 Improved efficacy with targeted PGx‐guided treatment of patients with depression and anxiety: A RCT demonstrating clinical utility Bradley 2018 NCT02878928 Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 93 8 PGx = 48; TAU = 47 PGx = 73; TAU = 72

PGx = 63;

TAU = 63

19–87 years MDD and/or anxiety by DSM‐V New to treatment OR inadequately controlled

HAM‐D17

PGx = 20; TAU = 20

PGx = NA; TAU = N/A

HAM‐D17 (≤ 7) CYP1A2, CYp2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 SLC6A4, COMT, HTR2A, MTHFR [27]
30,466,219 A PGx‐based antidepressant treatment for patients with MDD: Results from an 8‐week, Randomized, Single‐blinded Clinical Trial Han 2018 Not reported Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 100 8 PGx = 44; TAU = 44 PGx = 77; TAU = 73

PGx = 0;

TAU = 0

Age > 20 years MDD by DSM‐V ≥ CGI‐3 OR intolerance to current medication

QIDS‐C16

PGx = 24.5; TAU = 23.1

PGx = 2.5; TAU = 2.1

HAM‐D17 (≤ 7) CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, ABCB1, AKT1, BDNF, CACNG2, CES1, COMT, CRHR1, DDIT4, DRD3, EPHX1, FCHSD1, GRIK2, GRIK4, HLA‐A, HTR1A, HTR2A, HTR2C, LPHN3, NEFM, OPRM1, RGS4, RPTOR, SLC6A4, UGT2B15 [28]
30,677,646 Impact of pharmacogenomics on clinical outcomes in MDD in the GUIDED trial: A large, patient‐ and rater‐blinded, randomized, controlled study Greden 2019 NCT02109939 Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 1,167 8 PGx = 47; TAU = 48 PGx = 72; TAU = 70

PGx = 79;

TAU = 82

Age ≥ 18 years MDD by ≥11 on QIDS‐C16 Inadequate response

HAM‐D17

PGx = 21.1; TAU = 21.4

PGx = 3.5; TAU = 3.5

HAM‐D17 (≤7) CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP2B6 SLC6A4, HTR2A [29]
31,572,113 Preliminary Clinical Investigation of Combinatorial PGx Testing for the Optimized Treatment of Depression: A Randomized Single‐Blind Study Shan 2019 Not reported Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 71 8 PGx = 27; TAU = 29 PGx = 61; TAU = 65

PGx = 0;

TAU = 0

Age 18–51 years MDD by DSM‐V HAM‐D17 ≥ 17 baseline Tx naive or free from medication for 2 weeks

HAM‐D17

PGx = 21 TAU = 20.9

PGx = NA; TAU = NA

HAM‐D17 (≤ 7) CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP1A2 SLC6A4, HTR2A [30]
32,383,277 Randomized, controlled, participant‐ and rater‐blind trial of PGx test‐guided treatment vs. treatment as usual for MDD Perlis 2020 NCT02634177 Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 296 8 PGx = 48; TAU = 48 PGx = 71; TAU = 73

PGx = 74;

TAU = 72

Age ≥ 18 years MDD by DSM‐V > 18 SIGH‐D‐17

SIGH‐D‐17

PGx = 22.5; TAU = 22.1

PGx = 1.43

TAU = 1.52

SIGH‐D (≤ 7) CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4/5 SLC6A4, CACANA1C, ANK3, 5HT2C, MC4R, DRD2, COMT, ADRA2A, MTHFR, BDNF, OPRM1, GRIK1 [31]
33,938,307 A prospective study to determine the clinical utility of PGx testing of veterans with treatment‐resistant depression McCarthy 2021 NCT04469322 Blinded (participant) RCT 102 8 PGx = 52.5; TAU = 50.3 PGx = 21; TAU = 24

PGx = 66;

TAU = 69

Age ≥ 18 years veterans, MDD or Bipolar Depression Failed at least 1 medication

QIDS‐SR

PGx = 13.9; TAU = 13

PGx = NA; TAU = NA

CGI (≤ 2) CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, DRD2, HLA‐B, 5HTTLPR, HTR2A, HTR2C, POLG, SLC6A4, UGT1A4 [32]
35,288,545 Clinical utility of combinatorial PGx testing in depression: A Canadian patient‐ and rater‐blinded, RCT Tiwari 2022 NCT02466477 Blinded (participant & rater) RCT 308 8 PGx1 = 40; PGx2 = 41; TAU = 42 PGx1 = 66; PGx2 = 65; TAU = 63 PGx1 = 80; PGx2 = 83; TAU = 89 Age ≥ 18 years MDD by DSM‐IV QIDS‐C16 ≥ 11 Inadequate response to at least 1 medication

HAM‐D17

PGx 1 = 21.3; PGx2 = 21.5; TAU = 21.4

PGx 1 = 4; PGx2 = 3.7; TAU = 3

HAM‐D17 (≤ 7) CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 CNRI, GCG, HTR2A, HCRTR2, MC4R, NDUFS1, NPY, SLC6A4 [34]
35,819,423

Effect of PGx Testing for Drug‐Gene Interactions

on Medication Selection and Remission of Symptoms

in MDD

The PRIME Care Randomized Clinical Trial

Oslin 2022 NCT03170362 Open‐Label, controlled 1944 24 PGx = 48; TAU = 47 PGx = 24; TAU = 27

PGx = 67

TAU = 70

Age 18–80 years, veterans, MDD, History of at least 1 treatment episode, plan to start new episode of antidepressant monotherapy, PHQ‐9 > 9.

PHQ‐9

PGx = 17.5; TAU = 17.5

PGx = NA; TAU = NA

PHQ‐9 (≤5) CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2B6, CYP1A, CYP3A4, UDT1A4, UDT2B15, SLC6A4, HTR2A, HLA‐A, HLA‐B [33]

DSM‐IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition; HAMD, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; MDD, major depression disorder; N/A, not applicable; PGx, pharmacogenomic; RCT, randomized controlled trial.