Skip to main content
letter
. 2022 Oct 12;25(12):2675–2687. doi: 10.1111/ele.14124

TABLE 2.

Effect sizes from random effects meta‐analyses of dispersal syndromes, that is bias of phenotypic values for dispersers compared to residents

Phenotypic trait Parameter Estimate [CI] I 2 [CI]
Body size ALL 0.23 ± 0.08 [0.08–0.39], p = 0.003 78.4 [58.5–90.4]
ABU 0.17 ± 0.11 [−0.04–0.39], p = 0.117 82.3 [65.7–92.2]
LOW 0.34 ± 0.09 [0.17–0.51], p = 0.001 70.3 [41.9–86.3]
Locomotion morphology ALL 0.24 ± 0.07 [0.11–0.38], p = 0.004 75.4 [53.1–89.4]
NOPRED 0.25 ± 0.09 [0.07–0.42], p = 0.006 80.9 [59.7–91.3]
PRED 0.31 ± 0.10 [0.12–0.50], p = 0.001 84.2 [69.5–93.2]
Activity ALL 0.25 ± 0.10 [0.06–0.43], p = 0.009 88.9 [77.0–95.2]

Notes: Only effect sizes with substantial effects in best averaged models (see statistical and results sections and Table 1) are reported. Estimates and confidence intervals (CI) and heterogeneity index I 2 of effect sizes among species (%) are given for each phenotypic trait overall environmental conditions (i.e. ALL) or in each environmental condition (ABU, abundant resources; LOW, low resources; NOPRED, without predation risk; PRED, with predation risk) depending on averaged models (Table 1).