Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 18;61(47):e202211732. doi: 10.1002/anie.202211732

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditions.

graphic file with name ANIE-61-0-g001.jpg

Run[a]

L

[H]/additive

Time [h]

Yield 3 a [%][b]

1

[Ni(L1)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

36

2

[Ni(L1)Cl2]

Mn/–

16

16

3

[Ni(L1)Cl2]

TDAE/–

16

0

4[c,d]

[Ni(L2)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

0

5[c]

[Ni(L3)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

55

6

[Ni(L3)Br2]

Zn/–

18

54

7[c,d]

[Ni(L4)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

8

8

[Ni(L5)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

59

9[c]

[Ni(L6)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

48

10[c,d]

[Ni(L7)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

0

11[c]

[Ni(L8)Cl2]

Zn/–

16

5

12

[Ni(L5)Cl2]

Zn/NaI

2

95 (88)

13

[Ni(L5)Cl2]

Zn/–

2

30

14[e]

[Ni(L5)Cl2]

Zn/NaI

2

60

[a] All reactions were carried out under N2 in dry DMA ([1 a]: 0.2 M, 2: 3 eq., [H]: 2 eq., TMSCl: 1 eq.; additive: 1 eq., cat: 10 mol%, unless otherwise specified). [b] Determined by 19F NMR on the reaction crude with an internal standard (CF3C6H5). In brackets, isolated yields after flash chromatography. [c] The catalytic complex was prepared in situ (L/NiCl2 ⋅ glyme: 15/10 mol%). [d] Dehalogenative homocoupling of 1 a was determined as the major product. [e] With reagent grade DMA and under air. [H]: reductant. NR: no reaction. TMSCl: chlorotrimethylsilane.