Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;2023(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Summary of findings table ‐ Any type of hormonal contraception (estrogen plus progestin or progestin‐only) compared to no contraception for COVID‐19 positive patients.

Any type of hormonal contraception (estrogen plus progestin or progestin‐only) compared to no contraception for COVID‐19 positive patients
Patient or population: COVID‐19 positive patients
Setting: COVID‐19 positive patients in tertiary care setting
Intervention: any type of hormonal contraception (estrogen plus progestin or progestin‐only)
Comparison: no contraception
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with no contraception Risk with any type of hormonal contraception (estrogen plus progestin or progestin‐only)
Hospitalization 38 per 1000 38 per 1000
(26 to 54) OR 0.99
(0.68 to 1.44) 123
(1 observational study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b,c  
Intubation 0 of 79 patients who did not use hormonal contraception required intubation compared to 0 of 44 patients who used hormonal contraception.   123
(1 observational study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b,c  
Mortality ‐ not measured  
Venous thromboembolism ‐ not measured  
Arterial thromboembolism ‐ not measured  
Acute respiratory distress syndrome ‐ not measured  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.
See interactive version of this table: https://gdt.gradepro.org/presentations/#/isof/isof_question_revman_web_432122675422248852.

a Downgraded for serious risk of bias given no ascertainment of hormonal contraception exposure and no information on variables used for adjustment, increasing risk of residual confounding.
b Downgraded for indirectness as the study was not performed in patients confirmed to be using contraception at time of outcome.
c Downgraded 2 levels for imprecision due to small sample size with wide confidence interval with results reported in only 1 study.