Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;102(1):e32631. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032631

Table 2.

Summary of the correlation between SMAD7 polymorphisms and CRC risk in five models.

SNPs Dominant model Recessive model Homozygous model Heterozygous model Additive model
OR (95% CI) P/I2 (%) OR (95% CI) P/I2 (%) OR (95% CI) P/I2 (%) OR (95% CI) P/I2 (%) OR (95% CI) P/I2 (%)
rs4939827 (T > C) CC + CT vs TT CC vs CT + TT CC vs TT CT vs TT C vs T
Removel unHWE 0.89 (0.83,0.97) <0.01/80.2% 0.89 (0.83,0.96) <0.01/78.4% 0.84 (0.76,0.93) <0.01/82.6% 0.91 (0.85,0.97) <0.01/68.3% 0.91 (0.87,0.96) <0.01/84.7%
Include unHWE 0.89 (0.77,1.04) <0.01/95.5% 0.91 (0.85,0.97) <0.01/78.1% 0.85 (0.77,0.94) <0.01/81.2% 0.90 (0.85,0.96) <0.01/66.6% 0.94 (0.88,0.99) <0.01/88.4%
Subgroup #
Ethnicity
Caucasian 0.87 (0.8,0.94) <0.01/80.3% 0.87 (0.79,0.95) <0.01/80.7% 0.79 (0.7,0.89) <0.01/85.3% 0.88 (0.83,0.94) <0.01/64.3% 0.89 (0.84,0.95) <0.01/85.3%
Asian 0.99 (0.82,1.2) <0.01/71.0% 0.93 (0.82,1.04) <0.01/73.2% 0.98 (0.79,1.21) <0.01/68.2% 1.04 (0.88,1.23) 0.01/60.4% 0.95 (0.85,1.07) <0.01/85.1%
African 1.08 (0.79,1.48) –/– 1.06 (0.88,1.28) –/– 1.11 (0.8,1.54) –/– 1.05 (0.76,1.46) –/– 1.05 (0.91,1.21) –/–
Mixed 0.92 (0.71,1.48) –/– 1.12 (0.86,1.47) –/– 1.03 (0.75,1.42) –/– 0.87 (0.67,1.14) –/– 1.01 (0.86,1.18) –/–
Control source
PB 0.82 (0.76,0.89) 0.474/0.0% 0.90 (0.82,0.99) 0.014/55.0% 0.80 (0.71,0.92) 0.082/40.0% 0.85 (0.78,0.92) 0.672/0.0% 0.9 (0.84,0.96) 0.016/54.1%
HB 1.09 (0.94,1.27) <0.01/77.5% 0.99 (0.85,1.15) <0.01/82.3% 1.07 (0.88,1.31) <0.01/81.6% 1.05 (0.92,1.19) <0.01/65.8% 1.0 (0.9,1.1) <0.01/84.1%
Mixed 0.77 (0.66,0.89) –/– 0.89 (0.76,1.04) –/– 0.81 (0.67,0.97) –/– 0.86 (0.73,1.00) –/– 0.89 (0.82,0.98) –/–
NA 0.83 (0.75,0.93) <0.01/84.1% 0.81 (0.74,0.88) <0.01/64.6% 0.73 (0.65,0.83) <0.01/76.3% 0.87 (0.79,0.96) <0.01/77.7% 0.87 (0.8,0.93) <0.01/85.3%
Sample scale
LARGE 0.90 (0.83, 0.97) <0.01/82.8% 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) <0.01/81.4% 0.84 (0.76, 0.93) <0.01/86.9% 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) <0.01/73.4% 0.91 (0.87, 0.96) <0.01/86.4%
SMALL 0.85 (0.62, 1.18) <0.01/67.2% 0.96 (0.74, 1.23) <0.01/60.8% 0.82 (0.67, 1.02) <0.01/70.1% 0.89 (0.72, 1.1) <0.01/50.3% 0.92 (0.7, 1.23) 0.09/50.2%
rs4464148 (T > C) CC + CT vs TT CC vs CT + TT CC vs TT CT vs TT C vs T
Removel unHWE 1.17 (1.07, 1.27) 0.058/45.3% 1.22 (1.11, 1.22) 0.404/3.9% 1.29 (1.17, 1.42) 0.286/17.1% 1.13 (1.04, 1.24) 0.040/48.8% 1.14 (1.09, 1.29) 0.100/38.7%
Include unHWE 1.11 (1.00, 1.23) <0.01/72.1% 1.23 (1.14, 1.33) 0.492/0.0% 1.25 (1.15, 1.36) 0.220/22.1% 1.07 (0.95, 1.20) <0.01/73.7% 1.12 (1.05, 1.20) <0.01/63.4%
Subgroup #
Ethnicity
Caucasian 1.15 (1.06, 1.26) 0.051/48.2% 1.21 (1.11, 1.33) 0.34/11.4% 1.29 (1.17, 1.42) 0.229/24.2% 1.12 (1.02, 1.23) 0.037/51.3% 1.13 (1.09, 1.18) 0.102/39.9%
Asian 1.33 (1.02, 1.72) –/– 1.75 (0.51, 6.01) –/– 1.82 (0.53, 6.25) –/– 1.31 (1.01, 1.71) –/– 1.32 (1.03, 1.68) –/–
Control source
PB 1.11 (0.95, 1.31) 0.138/49.5% 1.11 (0.93, 1.32) 0.307/15.3% 1.17 (0.97, 1.41) 0.156/46.2% 1.12 (0.97, 1.29) 0.233/31.4% 1.10 (1.01, 1.2) 0.098/56.9%
HB 1.12 (0.72, 1.75) 0.039/69.3% 1.69 (1.03, 2.76) 0.639/0.0% 1.52 (0.91, 2.55) 0.894/0.0% 1.07 (0.59, 1.96) <0.01/81.3% 1.17 (0.98, 1.4) 0.316/13.2%
NA 1.20 (1.09, 1.33) 0.134/46.3% 1.24 (1.11, 1.39) 0.361/6.4% 1.33 (1.18, 1.49) 0.162/41.6% 1.15 (1.07, 1.25) 0.316/15.2% 1.14 (1.1, 1.19) 0.058/56.1%
Sample scale
LARGE 1.18 (1.10, 1.27) 0.151/34.8% 1.21 (1.10, 1.32) 0.419/1.3% 1.27 (1.15, 1.41) 0.12/40.7% 1.15 (1.09, 1.23) 0.379/6.3% 1.14 (1.1, 1.19) 0.058/48.6%
SMALL 1.03 (0.49, 2.18) 0.117/59.4% 1.67 (0.98, 2.87) 0.345/0.0% 1.48 (1.03, 2.11) 0.94/0.0% 0.99 (0.35, 2.84) 0.04/76.2% 1.03 (0.8, 1.33) 0.482/38.7%
rs12953717 (C > T) TT + TC vs CC TT vs CC + TC TT vs CC TC vs CC T vs C
Removel unHWE 1.11 (1.01, 1.22) <0.01/76.7% 1.22 (1.15, 1.28) 0.209/22.0% 1.25 (1.13, 1.38) <0.01/55.3% 1.06 (0.96, 1.18) <0.01/77.2% 1.11 (1.05, 1.17) <0.01/67.0%
Include unHWE 1.08 (0.98, 1.18) <0.01/76.4% 1.17 (1.07, 1.28) <0.01/60.4% 1.18 (1.05, 1.33) <0.01/70.9% 1.06 (0.97, 1.17) <0.01/73.3% 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) <0.01/75.7%
Subgroup #
Ethnicity
Caucasian 1.13 (1.01, 1.28) <0.01/78.1% 1.26 (1.19, 1.34) 0.620/0.0% 1.34 (1.21, 1.48) 0.053/46.2% 1.07 (0.94, 1.21) <0.01/79.1% 1.14 (1.071.22) <0.01/66.8%
Asian 1.32 (0.83, 2.11) 0.048/74.4% 1.00 (0.73, 1.37) 0.17/46.9% 1.08 (0.79, 1.49) 0.426/0.0% 1.4 (0.78, 2.53) 0.017/82.4% 1.10 (0.97, 1.24) 0.337/0.0%
African 1.12 (0.93, 1.35) –/– 1.17 (0.83, 1.65) –/– 1.22 (0.85, 1.74) –/– 1.10 (0.91, 1.34) –/– 1.1 (0.95, 1.28) –/–
Mixed 0.92 (0.78, 1.10) 0.175/45.7% 1.05 (0.92, 1.20) 0.306/4.6% 1.0 (0.86, 1.16) 0.959/0.0% 0.88 (0.68, 1.13) 0.07/69.6% 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) 0.739/0.0%
Control source
PB 1.09 (0.88, 1.35) 0.019/70.0% 1.16 (1.0, 1.34) 0.406/0.0% 1.14 (0.97, 1.35) 0.562/0.0% 1.08 (0.83, 1.41) <0.01/78.5% 1.07 (0.99, 1.16) 0.363/6.1%
HB 1.0 (0.75, 1.34) <0.01/88.8% 1.3 (1.17, 1.44) 0.698/0.0% 1.23 (0.97, 1.57) 0.026/63.7% 0.93 (0.67, 1.28) <0.01/89.8% 1.07 (0.91, 1.25) <0.01/81.0%
Mixed 1.16 (1.01, 1.34) –/– 1.3 (1.09, 1.54) –/– 1.36 (1.13, 1.65) –/– 1.09 (0.94, 1.27) –/– 1.16 (1.06, 1.28) –/–
NA 1.17 (1.04, 1.32) 0.015/67.8% 1.18 (1.10, 1.27) 0.048/58.3% 1.28 (1.07, 1.54) <0.01/74.3% 1.12 (1.02, 1.23) 0.132/43.5% 1.13 (1.04, 1.24) <0.01/75.2%
Sample scale
LARGE 1.17 (1.10, 1.25) 0.073/42.8% 1.21 (1.15, 1.28) 0.339/10.8% 1.26 (1.13, 1.41) 0.046/55.7% 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) <0.01/0.0% 1.11 (1.04, 1.17) <0.01/71.2%
SMALL 0.93 (0.63, 1.4) <0.01/85.1% 1.42 (1.03, 1.97) 0.103/56.1% 1.21 (1.0, 1.47) 0.01/60.0% 0.96 (0.62, 1.47) <0.01/89.7% 1.27 (0.94, 1.72) 0.888/0.0%

Bold font indicates statistically significant results.

CRC = colorectal cancer, HB = hospital based, HWE = Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, LARGER = the total sample size in the study was greater than 1000, Mixed (control source) = the control group was derived from both PB and HB, Mixed (ethnicity) = Study subjects belong to two or more races that cannot be grouped together, NA = the source of the control group was unclear, PB = population based, SMAD7 = Sma-and Mad-Related Protein 7, SMALL = the total sample size in the study was less than 1000, unHWE = Not in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium study.

#, Data for subgroup analysis were obtained from the excluded unHWE study.