Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;102(1):e32631. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032631

Table 3.

Result of False-positive probability analysis at six prior probability levels.

Model Subgroup P value OR (95% CI) Statistical Power Prior probability
0.25 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001
Rs4939827
CC + CT vs TT Remove HWE .008 0.89 (0.83, 0.97) 1.000 0.023 0.067 0.441 0.888 0.988 0.999
Caucasian <.001 0.87 (0.8, 0.94) 1.000 0.001 0.004 0.040 0.296 0.808 0.977
NA .001 0.83 (0.75, 0.93) 1.000 0.004 0.012 0.116 0.570 0.930 0.993
LAGER <.001 0.90 (0.83, 0.97) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
CC vs CT + TT Remove HWE .003 0.89 (0.83, 0.96) 1.000 0.008 0.022 0.202 0.718 0.962 0.996
Caucasian .002 0.87 (0.79, 0.95) 1.000 0.006 0.017 0.159 0.657 0.950 0.995
PB .03 0.90 (0.82, 0.99) 1.000 0.083 0.014 0.750 0.968 0.997 1.000
NA <.001 0.81 (0.74, 0.88) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.006 0.059
LAGER .001 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) 1.000 0.003 0.009 0.095 0.515 0.914 0.991
CC vs TT Remove HWE <.001 0.84 (0.76, 0.93) 1.000 0.002 0.007 0.072 0.440 0.887 0.987
Caucasian <.001 0.79 (0.7, 0.89) 0.997 <0.001 0.001 0.010 0.096 0.515 0.914
PB .002 0.80 (0.71, 0.92) 0.995 0.005 0.016 0.148 0.638 0.946 0.994
NA <.001 0.73 (0.65, 0.83) 0.917 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.002 0.017 0.145
LAGER <.001 0.84 (0.76, 0.93) 1.000 0.002 0.007 0.072 0.440 0.887 0.987
CT vs TT Remove HWE .004 0.91 (0.85, 0.97) 1.000 0.011 0.033 0.273 0.791 0.974 0.997
Caucasian <.001 0.88 (0.83, 0.94) 1.000 <0.001 0.001 0.014 0.127 0.593 0.936
NA .006 0.87 (0.79, 0.96) 1.000 0.016 0.048 0.355 0.847 0.982 0.998
LAGER .01 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) 1.000 0.028 0.080 0.490 0.906 0.990 0.999
C vs T Remove HWE <.001 0.91 (0.87, 0.96) 1.000 0.002 0.005 0.052 0.354 0.846 0.982
Caucasian <.001 0.89 (0.84, 0.95) 1.000 0.001 0.004 0.044 0.317 0.823 0.979
PB .001 0.9 (0.84, 0.96) 1.000 0.004 0.012 0.120 0.579 0.932 0.993
NA <.001 0.87 (0.8, 0.93) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 0.004 0.041 0.299 0.810
LAGER <.001 0.91 (0.87, 0.96) 1.000 0.002 0.005 0.052 0.354 0.846 0.982
Rs4464148*
CC + CT vs TT Caucasian .003 1.15 (1.06, 1.26) 1.000 0.008 0.024 0.212 0.730 0.964 0.996
CT vs TT Remove HWE .01 1.13 (1.04, 1.24) 1.000 0.029 0.082 0.495 0.908 0.990 0.999
Caucasian .018 1.12 (1.02, 1.23) 1.000 0.051 0.138 0.637 0.947 0.994 0.999
C vs T Include HWE .001 1.12 (1.05, 1.20) 1.000 0.004 0.011 0.113 0.562 0.928 0.992
PB .03 1.10 (1.01, 1.2) 1.000 0.087 0.023 0.759 0.969 0.997 1.000
NA <.001 1.14 (1.1, 1.19) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
LAGER <.001 1.14 (1.1, 1.19) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Rs12953717
TT + TC vs CC Remove HWE .03 1.11 (1.01, 1.22) 1.000 0.084 0.015 0.751 0.968 0.997 1.000
Caucasian .05 1.13 (1.01, 1.28) 1.000 0.141 0.030 0.844 0.982 0.998 1.000
NA .01 1.17 (1.04, 1.32) 1.000 0.031 0.088 0.515 0.915 0.991 0.999
LAGER <.001 1.17 (1.10, 1.25) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.003 0.032 0.247
TT vs CC + TC Include HWE <.001 1.17 (1.07, 1.28) 1.000 0.002 0.006 0.057 0.381 0.860 0.984
NA <.001 1.18 (1.10, 1.27) 1.000 <0.001 0.001 0.001 0.010 0.092 0.504
TT vs CC Remove HWE <.001 1.25 (1.13, 1.38) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.010 0.090 0.496
Include HWE .007 1.18 (1.05, 1.33) 1.000 0.020 0.057 0.399 0.870 0.985 0.999
Caucasian <.001 1.34 (1.21, 1.48) 0.987 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
NA .009 1.28 (1.07, 1.54) 0.954 0.027 0.077 0.480 0.903 0.989 0.999
LAGER <.001 1.26 (1.13, 1.41) 0.999 <0.001 0.001 0.006 0.053 0.361 0.850
TC vs CC LAGER <.001 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) 1.000 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.004 0.035
T vs C Remove HWE <.001 1.11 (1.05, 1.17) 1.000 <0.001 0.001 0.010 0.093 0.505 0.911
Include HWE .016 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) 1.000 0.047 0.128 0.618 0.942 0.994 0.999
Caucasian <.001 1.14 (1.07, 1.22) 1.000 <0.001 0.001 0.015 0.132 0.604 0.939
NA .01 1.13 (1.04, 1.24) 1.000 0.029 0.082 0.495 0.908 0.990 0.999
LAGER <.001 1.11 (1.04, 1.17) 1.000 <0.001 0.001 0.010 0.093 0.505 0.911

CI = confidence interval, GC = gastric cancer, HWE = Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, LAGER = the total sample size in the study was greater than 1000, NA = control source unknow, OR = odds ratio, PB = population based.

*

No statistically significant ORs for the recessive and Homozygous models in RS4464148.

The statistical power is measured at an odd ratio of 1.5.