Table 2.
Unemployment, mobility and IT: Individual-level regressions.
| Dependent variable: Unemployed |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Mobility | –0.181*** | –0.239*** | –0.742 | 0.0236 |
| (0.031) | (0.037) | (1.559) | (1.358) | |
| IT | –0.00697 | 0.0187*** | 0.0193** | 0.0292*** |
| (0.005) | (0.007) | (0.009) | (0.011) | |
| Mobility IT | 0.0699*** | 0.0656** | 0.0677*** | |
| (0.023) | (0.032) | (0.025) | ||
| R-squared | 0.00346 | 0.00418 | 0.0293 | 0.0384 |
| N | 71,812 | 71,812 | 71,812 | 71,812 |
| Controls | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| State FEs | No | No | No | Yes |
Results of estimating Eq. 4:
where is a dummy that equals one if the individual is unemployed in month , where t (April/May 2020) and zero otherwise. is the change in mobility in the MSA where the individual lives and is the level of IT adoption in the MSA where individual i lives. are individual level controls. are MSA-level controls, including the level and the interaction between mobility and GDP per capita, the share of minorities, the share of people with a three year Bachelor’s degree, and the unemployment rate in February 2020. are state fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered at the MSA level. The regressions are weighted by the assigned weight of the respondent. * , ** , *** . See Section 3 and Section 5 for more details.