Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 10;81:102330. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102330

Table 2.

Unemployment, mobility and IT: Individual-level regressions.

Dependent variable: Unemployed
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Δ Mobility –0.181*** –0.239*** –0.742 0.0236
(0.031) (0.037) (1.559) (1.358)
IT –0.00697 0.0187*** 0.0193** 0.0292***
(0.005) (0.007) (0.009) (0.011)
Δ Mobility × IT 0.0699*** 0.0656** 0.0677***
(0.023) (0.032) (0.025)

R-squared 0.00346 0.00418 0.0293 0.0384
N 71,812 71,812 71,812 71,812
Controls No No Yes Yes
State FEs No No No Yes

Results of estimating Eq. 4:

Unemployedi,t=α+β1ΔMobilitymsa(i),t+β2ITmsa(i)+β3ΔMobilitymsa(i,t)*ITmsa(i)+Ziδ+Xmsa(i)σ+(Xmsa(i)*Mobilitymsa(i),t)γ++αs(i)+ϵi,t

where Unemployedi,t is a dummy that equals one if the individual is unemployed in month t, where t (April/May 2020) and zero otherwise. ΔMobilitymsa(i),t is the change in mobility in the MSA where the individual lives and ITmsa(i) is the level of IT adoption in the MSA where individual i lives. Zi are individual level controls. Xmsa(i) are MSA-level controls, including the level and the interaction between mobility and GDP per capita, the share of minorities, the share of people with a three year Bachelor’s degree, and the unemployment rate in February 2020. αs(i) are state fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered at the MSA level. The regressions are weighted by the assigned weight of the respondent. * p<0.1, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01. See Section 3 and Section 5 for more details.