Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2023 Jan 9;6:20. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04406-5

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© The Author(s) 2023

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 4 — Bacterial species that were differentially abundant between the sexes and impacted by ligand treatment in males showed a correlation with a plasma glucose levels n = 32 sexes combined, n = 16 for males only in blue), b insulin levels (n = 31 sexes combined, n = 15 for males only in blue), c visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in relation to total fat (n = 16, males only), d with Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC) proliferation score (n = 14, sexes combined), and e with F4/80⁺ macrophage colonic infiltration (n = 11 sexes combined). Metabolic and phenotypic parameters were previously analyzed and reported¹⁷. The best fit line was fitted with 95% confidence intervals, r Pearson correlation coefficient, and P value from a two-tailed Student’s t-test.