Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 4;22:15330338221139164. doi: 10.1177/15330338221139164

Table 1.

Performance Comparison of the Proposed Model With Representative Models (Mean ± Variance).

Model ASD HD95 SD SO VD
Unetd2 0.8719 ± 0.7331 4.9627 ± 84.6213 0.7905 ± 0.0095 0.7657 ± 0.01 0.8742 ± 0.0018
U-Net 0.9189 ± 0.8865 5.5606 ± 94.9406 0.7877 ± 0.0073 0.755 ± 0.0077 0.8751 ± 0.0011
Unet++ 0.8965 ± 0.8039 5.0277 ± 90.1666 0.8028 ± 0.0083 0.776 ± 0.0094 0.8763 ± 0.0017
V3_R 1.9469 ± 7.0177 10.2482 ± 228.4469 0.7121 ± 0.0139 0.7125 ± 0.0135 0.8452 ± 0.0033
V3_D 0.9739 ± 1.0429 5.602 ± 130.6175 0.771 ± 0.0109 0.7438 ± 0.0111 0.8673 ± 0.002
M-Net 0.6986 ± 0.0547 3.491 ± 2.9798 0.8045 ± 0.0064 0.7694 ± 0.0071 0.8787 ± 0.0013
WideMnet 0.7855 ± 0.1443 4.148 ± 15.4051 0.7945 ± 0.0063 0.7632 ± 0.0072 0.8778 ± 0.0012
Mnet_Im 0.6901 ± 0.0564 3.2013 ± 2.0014 0.8084 ± 0.0067 0.7785 ± 0.0065 0.8828 ± 0.0010

Note: Bold represents best values among comparison methods.