Table 3.
Decoding accuracy for NT and ASD groups within the NOIs, intersections of interest, complement regions, and combination of all networks. Between-group comparisons were conducted for the three NOIs. ∩: Intersection of two NOIs.
| Networks of Interest | NT |
ASD |
NT vs ASD |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Against Chance |
Against Chance |
FDR corrected p-value | |||||
| Mean | SD | FDR corrected p-value | Mean | SD | FDR corrected p-value | ||
| Speech Perception Network | 56.2 | 8.8 | 0.001 | 52.5 | 8.7 | 0.142 | 0.110 |
| Working Memory Network | 54.3 | 8.8 | 0.009 | 52.3 | 7.4 | 0.142 | 0.194 |
| Speech Production Network | 57.7 | 7.1 | 0.000 | 52.6 | 7.3 | 0.141 | 0.024 |
| Perception ∩ Production | 55.5 | 8.6 | 0.002 | 51.6 | 9.4 | 0.248 | 0.122 |
| Working Memory ∩ Production | 53.8 | 8.8 | 0.015 | 51.0 | 7.8 | 0.279 | 0.143 |
| Complement Regions | 55.8 | 8.9 | 0.002 | 53.3 | 7.1 | 0.142 | NA |
| Union of all three NOIs | 56.4 | 7.8 | 0.0005 | 52.2 | 6.5 | 0.142 | NA |
| Intersection of all three NOIs | 55.5 | 8.8 | 0.002 | 51.6 | 9.4 | 0.248 | NA |