Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 10;277(2):e376–e383. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004912

Table 1.

Preoperative Characteristics Associated With Using Choledochoscopy Versus Blind Basket Transcystic Exploration

Characteristics Choledochoscopy (n = 486) Blind Basket (n = 386) P-value OR (95% CI)
Median age (range) 57 (8–89) yr 55 (16–90) yr <0.001
Female sex 298 (61.3%) 283 (73.3%) <0.001 0.577 (0.432, 0.771)
Emergency admission 392 (80.7%) 243 (63.0%) <0.001 2.454 (1.808, 3.331)
Admission diagnosis
Jaundice 259 (53.3%) 119 (30.8%) <0.001 2.560 (1.935, 3.387)
Acute pain 302 (62.1%) 181 (46.9%) <0.001 1.859 (1.417, 2.438)
Chronic biliary pain 102 (21.0%) 138 (35.8%) <0.001 0.477 (0.353, 0.645)
Cholangitis 42 (8.6%) 10 (2.6%) <0.001 3.557 (1.761, 7.185)
Acute Pancreatitis 72 (14.8%) 48 (12.4%) 0.311 1.225 (0.827, 1.813)
Acute Cholecystitis 35 (7.2%) 39 (10.1%) 0.127 0.690 (0.428, 1.113)
Ultrasound scan
Multiple stones 423 (87.0%) 367 (95.1%) <0.001 0.348 (0.204, 0.592)
Contracted/thick GB 94 (19.3%) 62 (16.1%) 0.209 1.253 (0.881, 1.783)
Dilated CBD 243 (50.0%) 94 (24.4%) <0.001 3.106 (2.318, 4.162)
MRCP 97 (20.0%) 28 (7.3%) <0.001 3.188 (2.045, 4.972)
CT scan 57 (11.7%) 21 (5.4%) 0.001 2.309 (1.374, 3.882)
ERCP 24 (4.9%) 9 (2.3%) 0.045 2.176 (0.999, 4.738)
CBD stone Risk 416 (85.6%) 242 (62.7%) <0.001 3.536 (2.551, 4.902)

Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

CBD indicates common bile duct; CT, computerized tomography; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; GB, gallbladder; MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.