Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 5;101:skac322. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac322

Table 4.

Growth performance, observed net energy concentration, morbidity, and mortality of newly received feedlot calves-fed diets containing different roughage levels (wheat hay; 30% or 60%; DM basis) and supplemental fat (yellow grease; 0 [−FAT] or 3.5% [+FAT]; DM basis)

Item Roughage level Supplemental fat SEM1 P-value
30% 60% −FAT +FAT Roughage Fat Roughage × Fat
Pens (steers) 12 (36) 12 (36) 12 (36) 12 (36) - - - -
Days on feed 58 58 58 58 - - - -
Growth performance
 Initial body weight, kg 200 199 200 200 6.00 - - -
 Final body weight, kg 285 269 270 284 11.2 0.08 0.13 0.94
 Dry matter intake, kg/d 6.00 5.92 5.87 6.04 0.297 0.85 0.64 0.94
 Average daily gain, kg 1.47 1.20 1.21 1.46 0.144 0.07 0.09 0.91
 Gain efficiency2 0.249 0.204 0.207 0.246 0.016 0.01 0.03 0.80
Observed NE, Mcal/kg3
 Maintenance 2.09 1.84 1.86 2.07 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.88
 Gain 1.42 1.21 1.23 1.40 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.87
Observed:expected NE ratio4
 Maintenance 1.02 1.09 1.02 1.08 0.05 0.22 0.18 0.80
 Gain 1.03 1.11 1.03 1.11 0.06 0.22 0.16 0.76
Health
 Cattle treated for respiratory disease5, %
 First Treatment 50.0 47.2 44.4 52.8 9.61 0.82 0.49 0.82
 Second Treatment 19.4 11.1 8.33 22.2 6.50 0.32 0.10 0.32
 Third treatment 11.1 2.78 5.56 8.33 6.10 0.14 0.62 0.62
 Number of antimicrobial treatments required 1.75 1.34 1.51 1.58 0.272 0.11 0.78 0.30
Mortality, %, (n) 8.33 (3) 2.78 (1) 5.56 (2) 5.56 (2) 3.87 0.31 1.00 0.31

1 Standard error of the mean.

2 Gain-to-feed ratio (G:F; kg/kg).

3 Calculated according to Zinn and Shen (1998).

4 Expected values were calculated using the NASEM (2016)—Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements Model, empirical solution model, based on the diet composition presented in Table 1.

5 Calves were observed daily for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) signs according to the 4-point scale method based on depression, anorexia, respiratory, and temperature (“DART” system) as described by Step et al. (2008) and Wilson et al. (2015).