Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 3;101:skac343. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac343

Table 3.

Carcass characteristics of Angus- and Wagyu-sired cattle raised to a similar days on feed end point—experiment 1

Item Treatment 1 SEM2 P-value
AN (n = 7) WA-GD (n = 9) WA-MD (n = 12)
Final weight, kg 555a 549a 506b 44.8 0.01
HCW, kg 353a 352a 326b 32.0 0.02
DP, % 63.73 64.21 64.24 0.799 0.74
KPH, % 2.33c 3.35a 2.87b 0.165 0.01
12th Rib
 LM area, cm2 84.7 84.1 81.6 5.99 0.66
 Backfat thickness, cm 2.14 2.13 1.90 0.308 0.60
 USDA YG3 3.85 4.09 3.64 0.367 0.45
 BCTRC, %4 47.79 47.26 48.35 0.855 0.42
 USDA QG5 12.04 12.23 12.83 0.368 0.17
 Marbling score6 652 655 728 36.6 0.11
6th Rib
 LM area, cm2 44.2 42.6 40.8 3.40 0.25
 Backfat thickness, cm 2.90 3.12 3.07 0.225 0.62
 Rib thickness, cm 7.55 6.75 6.74 0.454 0.16
 Japanese YG, % 7 71.08 70.18 70.34 0.331 0.07
 Marbling score6 684 694 743 37.1 0.24

1AN = Angus-sired steers selected for a combination of growth and marbling potential, WA-GD = Fukutsuru-sired Wagyu cattle selected for growth potential, WA-MD = Yasufuku-sired Wagyu cattle selected for marbling potential.

2The reported standard error of the mean is the greatest between the different treatments.

3YG = 2.5 + (2.5 × (12th rib fat thickness/2.54)) + (0.2 × % KPH) + (0.0038 × HCW/0.453592)) – (0.32 × (LM area/6.4516)).

4BCTRC (boneless closely trimmed retail cuts) = 51.34 – (2.28 × (12th rib fat thickness)) – (0.462 × % KPH) – (0.02 × (HCW)) + (0.1147 × (LM area)).

5USDA QG is based on a numeric scale: 11 = average choice, 12 = high choice.

6Marbling score is based on a numeric scale: 600-699 = moderate, 700-799 = slightly abundant.

7Japanese YG = 67.37 + (0.13 × (LM area/ 6.4516)) + (0.667 × (6th rib fat thickness/ 2.54)) - (0.025 × (carcass side weight/ 0.453592)) - (0.896 × (6th rib thickness/ 2.54)).

a,bTreatment lsmean estimates within a row, with a different superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05).