Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;52(1):afac309. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac309

Table 2.

Summary of findings with GRADE.

Outcomes Results No of participants
(Studies)
Follow-up range
Quality of the evidence (GRADE)e
Mortality (meta-analysis) HR: 1.04 (1.03–1.05) for 0.01 change in FI-Lab 11,032
(11 studies)
6 months–7 years
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖
MODERATE
Due to indirectnessa
Mortality (meta-analysis—81+ years of age) HR: 1.04 (1.03–1.05) for 0.01 change in FI-Lab for age 81+ years old 7,079
(9 studies)
6 months–7 years
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕
HIGH
Mortality (whole subgroup) High FI-Lab scores were associated with increased risk of mortality in all studies 69,691
(23 studies)
6 months–18 years
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖
MODERATE
Due to indirectnessa
Adverse health outcomes High FI-Lab scores were associated with increased risk of at least one adverse health outcome in 94% of studies 36,526
(18 studies)
1 month–18 years
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖
MODERATE
Due to indirectnessb
Sex differences No clear association between FI-Lab and sex was found across all studies; 5 studies found no sex difference in FI-Lab scores, 3 found higher FI-Lab scores in males, 2 found higher FI-Lab scores in females and 1 found an age dependent sex effect 48,274
(13 studies)
N/A
⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖
VERY LOW
Due to indirectnessa
Risk of biasc
Inconsistencyd

aThe studies are not wholly representative of our target age range of 20+ years.

bThe studies are not wholly representative of our target age range of 20+ years. Each study identified a different adverse outcome.

cRisk of bias due to studies including men and women but not reporting sex-based analyses.

dInconsistency in results across studies. More evidence is needed to make conclusions about sex differences.

eScores out of 4. ⊕ indicates a point. ⊖ indicates the absence of a point.