Table 2.
Outcomes | Results | No of participants (Studies) Follow-up range |
Quality of the evidence (GRADE)e |
---|---|---|---|
Mortality (meta-analysis) | HR: 1.04 (1.03–1.05) for 0.01 change in FI-Lab | 11,032 (11 studies) 6 months–7 years |
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖
MODERATE Due to indirectnessa |
Mortality (meta-analysis—81+ years of age) | HR: 1.04 (1.03–1.05) for 0.01 change in FI-Lab for age 81+ years old | 7,079 (9 studies) 6 months–7 years |
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕
HIGH |
Mortality (whole subgroup) | High FI-Lab scores were associated with increased risk of mortality in all studies | 69,691 (23 studies) 6 months–18 years |
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖
MODERATE Due to indirectnessa |
Adverse health outcomes | High FI-Lab scores were associated with increased risk of at least one adverse health outcome in 94% of studies | 36,526 (18 studies) 1 month–18 years |
⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖
MODERATE Due to indirectnessb |
Sex differences | No clear association between FI-Lab and sex was found across all studies; 5 studies found no sex difference in FI-Lab scores, 3 found higher FI-Lab scores in males, 2 found higher FI-Lab scores in females and 1 found an age dependent sex effect | 48,274 (13 studies) N/A |
⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖
VERY LOW Due to indirectnessa Risk of biasc Inconsistencyd |
aThe studies are not wholly representative of our target age range of 20+ years.
bThe studies are not wholly representative of our target age range of 20+ years. Each study identified a different adverse outcome.
cRisk of bias due to studies including men and women but not reporting sex-based analyses.
dInconsistency in results across studies. More evidence is needed to make conclusions about sex differences.
eScores out of 4. ⊕ indicates a point. ⊖ indicates the absence of a point.