Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;50(1):43–57. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01225-y

Table 3.

Multi-moderator analyses for depression outcomes

Moderator level d SE Z P CI
Intercept 1.22 0.17 7.20  < .0001 0.88 to 1.56
Region UK Ref
North America − 0.04 0.10 − 0.34 0.733 − 0.24 to 0.17
Mainland Europe − 0.25 0.13 − 1.94 0.053 − 0.50 to 0.00
Asia − 0.62 0.24 − 2.62 0.001* − 1.09 to − 0.16
Australasia − 0.49 0.26 − 1.87 0.062 − 1.01 to 0.02
Severity Mild Ref
Moderate − 0.13 0.11 − 1.17 0.241 − 0.34 to 0.09
Severe − 0.10 0.15 − 0.70 0.482 − 0.39 to 0.18
University (mild-to-severe) 0.20 0.15 1.34 0.180 − 0.01 to 0.93
Therapy modality Cognitive-behavioural Ref
Psychodynamic 0.07 0.11 0.62 0.540 − 0.15 to 0.28
Counselling − 0.27 0.23 − 1.19 0.236 − 0.71 to 0.18
Other − 0.04 0.12 − 0.33 0.742 − 0.28 to 0.12
Treatment stage Preliminary studies Ref
Routine evaluations − 0.12 0.13 − 0.99 0.324 − 0.37 to 0.12
Analysis Includes lost to follow up Ref
Completers 0.16 0.13 2.01 0.045* 0.00 to 0.32
Experience Qualified staff Ref
Trainees − 0.29 0.14 − 2.06 0.039* − 0.57 to − 0.01
Sample size Large Ref
Medium − 0.15 0.10 − 1.44 0.151 − 0.35 to 0.05
Small − 0.21 0.11 − 1.83 0.069 − 0.43 to 0.02
Publication year − 0.001 0.01 − 0.19 0.851 − 0.01 to 0.01
Sample age − 0.004 0.01 − 0.67 0.503 − 0.02 to 0.01
% Female 0.13 0.23 0.56 0.574 − 0.33 to 0.59

k = 124, Tau2 = 0.17[SE = 0.02], I2 = 99.99%, R2 = 19.28%

* = < .05