Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2022 Aug 4;2:59. doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00141-7

Table 2:

Comparison of the most frequently used sample delivery approaches

Delivery method Crystal size Mother liquor restrictions Background scattering Triggering compatibility Technical Complexity Efficient use of Sample need for testing/static data set Comments and Caveats
sample beamtime
Fixed targets/chips
SF-ROX (Goniometer mounted single crystals) Several 100 μm None.
Typically cryocooled
low Only electric field jumps Low High (but ~ 50 μm translations between exposures) medium due to frequent crystal changes Few crystals/50–100 crystals SF-ROX, similar to helical scans at synchrotron sources
Fixed targets (Non-patterned chip) Any size None, LCP possible Low for thin sample thickness and thin films Pump probe (light scattering may be an issue)
Slow chemical mixing in humidity-controlled environment
low Lower than patterned high 5 μl conc. cystal suspension/1–2 chips Loading must be fast or in humid atmosphere to prevent sample dehydration which can result in nonisomorphism or other changes in diffraction properties. Samples and foils must be thin (few μm) for low background. Evaporation through thin foils or XFEL generated shot holes may be an issue, in particular when using vacuum chambers. The latter as well as diffusion of X-ray induced radicals affects spacing between exposures. Spacing between adjacent exposures in a row can be shorter than between rows.
Frequent chip changes required (typically 10–15 min/chip)
Fixed targets (Patterned chip) Should fit hole size Not too viscous Low for thin sample thickness and thin films Pump probe (light scattering may be an issue in transparent chips); Chemical mixing in humidity-controlled environment long time delays possible low High high 5–50 μl/1–2 chips Loading and foil considerations as above. Moreover, blotting of mother liquor via perforated foils may result in crystal dehydration. The well depth determines the sample thickness (liquid film) in bottomless chips.
Droplet
DoD
DoT (tape)
Big enough for good signal, 5–200 μm, but smaller than ID of capillary Not too viscous (<40% PEG5000 or 35% glycerol) High (due to droplet size and when hitting tape Pump probe, chemical mixing 0.1 s - ~12s time delays high High high 100 μl, ideally 30 % crystals (v/v) / 200 μl ID of capillary sets upper limit on crystal size (Standard is 200 μm ID (which works fine for up to 80 μm longest crystal dimension)
Jets
GDVN <20 μm Not too viscous Very low Pump probe (fs-few μs)
Chemical mixing, long time delays challenging
high Very low Very high, including MHz 300 μl, ideally 10–20 % crystals (v/v)/1–2 ml Clogging of nozzles -> filtration of samples, prior and during injection, larger ID capillaries can help (50–100 μm) Settling of crystals -> anti-settling devices Fast video analysis to ensure jetting (and not spraying)
Do not collect in the breakup region of the jet -> low, unreliable hit rate or very close to nozzle
Test injection before beam time Compatible with MHz data collection
High viscosity extruders Big enough to yield good signal but smaller than ID of the nozzle None for grease-like matrix (but incompatible with some membrane protein crystals, causes dehydration in some crystals), LCP, cellulose, agarose, … limits on salt concentration, pH (not highly acidic) high Pump probe Medium High high 5 μl/50 μl ID of nozzle (50–100 μm) sets upper limit on crystal size
Clogging
Uneven flow rates, complicating in particular time-resolved experiments The flow can be disrupted by unattenuated XFEL beam
Efficient sample use for XFELs with pulse repetition rate of 120 Hz and lower, as well as synchrotrons