Table 2:
Delivery method | Crystal size | Mother liquor restrictions | Background scattering | Triggering compatibility | Technical Complexity | Efficient use of | Sample need for testing/static data set | Comments and Caveats | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sample | beamtime | ||||||||
Fixed targets/chips | |||||||||
SF-ROX (Goniometer mounted single crystals) | Several 100 μm | None. Typically cryocooled |
low | Only electric field jumps | Low | High (but ~ 50 μm translations between exposures) | medium due to frequent crystal changes | Few crystals/50–100 crystals | SF-ROX, similar to helical scans at synchrotron sources |
Fixed targets (Non-patterned chip) | Any size | None, LCP possible | Low for thin sample thickness and thin films | Pump probe (light scattering may be an issue) Slow chemical mixing in humidity-controlled environment |
low | Lower than patterned | high | 5 μl conc. cystal suspension/1–2 chips | Loading must be fast or in humid atmosphere to prevent sample dehydration which can result in nonisomorphism or other changes in diffraction properties. Samples and foils must be thin (few μm) for low background. Evaporation through thin foils or XFEL generated shot holes may be an issue, in particular when using vacuum chambers. The latter as well as diffusion of X-ray induced radicals affects spacing between exposures. Spacing between adjacent exposures in a row can be shorter than between rows. Frequent chip changes required (typically 10–15 min/chip) |
Fixed targets (Patterned chip) | Should fit hole size | Not too viscous | Low for thin sample thickness and thin films | Pump probe (light scattering may be an issue in transparent chips); Chemical mixing in humidity-controlled environment long time delays possible | low | High | high | 5–50 μl/1–2 chips | Loading and foil considerations as above. Moreover, blotting of mother liquor via perforated foils may result in crystal dehydration. The well depth determines the sample thickness (liquid film) in bottomless chips. |
Droplet | |||||||||
DoD DoT (tape) |
Big enough for good signal, 5–200 μm, but smaller than ID of capillary | Not too viscous (<40% PEG5000 or 35% glycerol) | High (due to droplet size and when hitting tape | Pump probe, chemical mixing 0.1 s - ~12s time delays | high | High | high | 100 μl, ideally 30 % crystals (v/v) / 200 μl | ID of capillary sets upper limit on crystal size (Standard is 200 μm ID (which works fine for up to 80 μm longest crystal dimension) |
Jets | |||||||||
GDVN | <20 μm | Not too viscous | Very low | Pump probe (fs-few μs) Chemical mixing, long time delays challenging |
high | Very low | Very high, including MHz | 300 μl, ideally 10–20 % crystals (v/v)/1–2 ml | Clogging of nozzles -> filtration of samples, prior and during injection, larger ID capillaries can help (50–100 μm) Settling of crystals -> anti-settling devices Fast video analysis to ensure jetting (and not spraying) Do not collect in the breakup region of the jet -> low, unreliable hit rate or very close to nozzle Test injection before beam time Compatible with MHz data collection |
High viscosity extruders | Big enough to yield good signal but smaller than ID of the nozzle | None for grease-like matrix (but incompatible with some membrane protein crystals, causes dehydration in some crystals), LCP, cellulose, agarose, … limits on salt concentration, pH (not highly acidic) | high | Pump probe | Medium | High | high | 5 μl/50 μl | ID of nozzle (50–100 μm) sets upper limit on crystal size Clogging Uneven flow rates, complicating in particular time-resolved experiments The flow can be disrupted by unattenuated XFEL beam Efficient sample use for XFELs with pulse repetition rate of 120 Hz and lower, as well as synchrotrons |