Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 4;2023:4549033. doi: 10.1155/2023/4549033

Table 4.

Pathologic evaluation of breast tumors before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n, column %).

Pathologic comparison Before NAC n (%) After NAC n (%) p
Tumor pathology (via tru-cut bx. of the breast)
No tumor 0 (0.0) 23 (25.0)
DCIS 0 (0.0) 3 (3.3) NA
Infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) 87 (94.6) 60 (65.2)
Infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) 3 (3.3) 2 (2.2)
Other 2 (2.2) 4 (4.3)

ER McNemar p=
Negative 22 (23.9) 12 (13.0)
Positive 66 (71.7) 57(62.0)
Unavailable 4 (4.3) 23 (25.0)
Mean (%) ± SD 76.53 ± 21.85 80.57 ± 23.99 Mean p=0.034

PR McNemar p=
Negative 25 (27.2) 20 (21.7)
Positive 64 (69.6) 48 (52.2)
Unavailable 3 (3.3) 24 (26.1)
Mean (%) ± SD 63.05 ± 32.40 55.05 ± 31.87 Mean p=0.098

CerbB2
Negative 63 (68.5) 51 (55.4) McNemar p=
Positive 29 (31.5) 16 (17.4)
Unavailable 0 (0) 25 (27.2)

Ki67
Mean (%) ± SD 25.75 ± 15.16 20.36 ± 13.68 0.024

P53
Mean (%) ± SD 35.83 ± 38.27 37.50 ± 39.12 <0.001

Histologic grade
1 5 (5.4)
2 37 (40.2)
3 16 (17.4)

Nuclear grade
1 3 (3.3)
2 28 (30.4)
3 25 (27.2)

Lymphovascular invasion
Absent 58 (63)
Present 11 (12)