Table 4. The classification result of real tomato samples against the CLso genomic database.
| Sample | Real haplotype | Region | Group Rank | Group | Identity (%) | Matched SNP Score | Covered SNP Score | CDF (%) | Probability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J2 | A | 16S | 1 | A | 100.0 | 34.0 | 34.0 | 100 | 62 |
| 2 | B | 97.8 | 32.9 | 33.7 | 60 | 37 | |||
| J3 | A | 16S | 1 | A | 100.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 100 | 69 |
| 2 | B | 95.8 | 16.9 | 17.7 | 30 | 21 | |||
| 3 | H-Con | 94.4 | 17.0 | 18.0 | 15 | 11 | |||
| J5 | A | 16S | 1 | A | 100.0 | 34.0 | 34.0 | 100 | 62 |
| 2 | B | 97.8 | 32.9 | 33.7 | 60 | 37 | |||
| J6 | A | 16S | 1 | A | 100.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 100 | 84 |
| 2 | B | 94.6 | 30.9 | 32.7 | 18 | 15 | |||
| J8 | A | 16S | 1 | A | 100.0 | 32.0 | 32.0 | 100 | 63 |
| 2 | B | 97.6 | 30.9 | 31.7 | 58 | 36 | |||
| J9 | A | 16S | 1 | A | 100.0 | 34.0 | 34.0 | 100 | 83 |
| 2 | B | 94.8 | 31.9 | 33.7 | 19 | 16 | |||
| M1 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | A | 93.8 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 15 | 60 |
| 2 | B | 93.7 | 74.4 | 79.4 | 11 | 40 | |||
| M2 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | B | 100.0 | 81.4 | 81.4 | 100 | 100 |
| M3 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | B | 100.0 | 81.1 | 81.1 | 100 | 100 |
| M5 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | B | 96.9 | 74.1 | 76.4 | 47 | 94 |
| M6 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | B | 97.5 | 77.4 | 79.4 | 55 | 98 |
| M7 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | B | 100.0 | 78.4 | 78.4 | 100 | 100 |
| M8 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | B | 100.0 | 79.4 | 79.4 | 100 | 100 |
| M9 | A | 16S + 50S | 1 | A | 98.2 | 76.6 | 78.0 | 72 | 100 |
| M10 | B | 16S + 50S | 1 | B | 98.8 | 81.4 | 82.4 | 77 | 100 |
Note:
Samples J1, J4, J7 and J10 were tested positive in PCR, but the concentrations of PCR products were too low to be sequenced. Sample M4 was tested negative in PCR. Identity is the ratio of matched SNP score to covered SNP score. CDF is the cumulated density where the sample falls in the estimated distribution of the database. Probability is the classification likelihood. Only rows with probability greater than 10% are shown.