Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 11;153(1):209–223. doi: 10.1121/10.0016611

TABLE V.

Pairwise effects of high vs low variability for each source (between-talkers, within-talkers, or phonetic contrasts). For condition labels (A–H), refer to Table I and Fig. 1. *Significant after Holm–Bonferroni correction, α = 0.05.

Variability effects Conditions Δ RT (ms) Interference (%) β s.e. t df p
Between-talker variability (multiple vs single talker)
One exemplar and one contrast E > A 48.3  6.21 0.043 0.012 3.816 24.9 < 0.001*
Multiple exemplars and one contrast G > C 16.0 1.95 0.010 0.006 1.519 23.8 0.142
One exemplar and multiple contrasts F > B 6.8  0.64 0.003 0.004 0.760 22.6 0.455
Multiple exemplars and multiple contrasts H > D 15.1  1.38 0.008 0.006 1.399 23.1 0.175
Within-talker variability (multiple vs one exemplar)
Single talker and one contrast C > A 39.7  5.10 0.027 0.009 3.128 24.4 < 0.005*
Multiple talkers and one contrast G > E 7.3  0.89 −0.008 0.005 −1.464 28.7 0.154
Single talker and multiple contrasts D > B 26.2s 2.46 0.014 0.005 2.985 28.7 < 0.006*
Multiple talkers and multiple contrasts H > F 34.5  3.22 0.019 0.005 4.197 29.2 < 0.001*
Word-choice variability (multiple vs one phonemic contrast)
Single talker and one exemplar B > A 287.7  36.98 0.140 0.011 12.31 23.0 ≪ 0.001*
Multiple talkers and one exemplar F > E 246.2  29.79 0.099 0.007 15.09 29.5 ≪ 0.001*
Single talker and multiple exemplars D > C 274.2  33.54 0.130 0.007 18.29 23.0 ≪ 0.001*
Multiple talkers and multiple exemplars H > G 273.3  32.79 0.130 0.006 21.57 24.1 ≪ 0.001*