Table A.
Quality Appraisal of Eligible Qualitative Studies Using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, version 2018
| Yeh et al. (2016) | Lo et al. (2020) | Roberts et al. (2017) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Conclusion | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Hong QN, Pluye P, Fabregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, Gagnon M-P, Griffiths F, Nicolau B, O’Cathain A, Rousseau M-C, Vedel I. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada.
From Hong et al. (2018, in the public domain; permission is not required).