Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 28;19(1):44–52. doi: 10.1177/15563316221114135

Table 1.

Most common mode of failure (number of samples that failed in stated mechanism/number of samples), peak load (N), stiffness (N/mm), yield load (N), peak energy (N m), and ultimate energy (N m).

(1)
PTFE, 2 anchors, suture
(2)
PTFE, 2 anchors, minitape
(3)
HDA, 2 anchors, suture
(4)
HDA, 2 anchors, minitape
(5)
PTFE, 3 anchors, minitape
Significant differences between groups (P < .05)
Most common mode of failure Button-holing (4/6) Button-holing (6/6) Button-holing (6/6) Button-holing (6/6) Avulsion (3/6)
Statistical analysis was not performed.
Peak load (N) 293 ± 65 291 ± 36 226 ± 67 274 ± 62 384 ± 62 (3) vs (5)
(4) vs (5)
Stiffness (N/mm) 22 ± 3 22 ± 3 16 ± 4 17 ± 4 24 ± 3 (3) vs (5)
(4) vs (5)
Yield load (N) 268 ± 70 264 ± 33 194 ± 74 244 ± 50 343 ± 42 (3) vs (5)
(4) vs (5)
Peak energy (N m) 3 ± 1 3 ± 1 2 ± 1 2 ± 1 4 ± 2 (3) vs (5)
(4) vs (5)
Ultimate energy (N m) 4 ± 1 4 ± 1 2 ± 1 3 ± 1 8 ± 3 (1) vs (5)
(2) vs (5)
(3) vs (5)
(4) vs (5)

Data are mean ± SD. PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene, HDA human dermal allograft.