Table 3.
Receptive fields.
| Forelimb | Hindlimb | FL + HL | Head | None | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Dist | Prox | All | Dist | Prox | All | ||||
| FL(SR) | 21 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| HL | 10 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| FL–HL | 27 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11(3) | 2 | 3 | |||
Receptive fields for those cells that we tested, organized according to the classification of their discharge patterns (first column) as illustrated in Fig. 4. Receptive fields were divided into those that were distal (dist: distal to elbow or knee), proximal (prox), or which included the entire limb. Value in parenthesis for the FL–HL cells indicates that for 3 cells the receptive field also included the trunk. FL + HL, receptive field included forelimb and hindlimb. None, no receptive field was located. Receptive fields were not tested for 1 HL cell and for 1 FL–HL cell.