Table 4.
Results from the unconditional model, main effects model, and interaction model without controlling for word reading.
| Unconditional Model | Main Effects Model | Interaction Model | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Parameter | Logit | z-value | p-value | Logit | z-value | p-value | Logit | z-value | p-value |
|
| |||||||||
| Intercept | 1.29 | 3.70 | <0.001** | 1.27 | 5.99 | <.001*** | 0.94 | 3.62 | <0.001** |
| Word-Level Predictors | |||||||||
| C1: Poly vs Mono words | 0.04 | 0.09 | .931 | −0.12 | −0.28 | 0.780 | |||
| C2: Trans vs NonTrans words | 1.53 | 3.25 | .001** | 1.46 | 3.23 | 0.001** | |||
| SPTR | −2.20 | −4.26 | <.001*** | −1.92 | −3.73 | <0.001*** | |||
| Number of letters | 0.01 | 0.04 | .968 | −0.02 | −0.23 | 0.822 | |||
| Frequency | 0.07 | 3.35 | <.001*** | 0.07 | 3.66 | 0.003** | |||
| Concreteness | 0.55 | 2.90 | .004** | 0.27 | 1.18 | 0.238 | |||
| Person-Level Predicts | |||||||||
| Grade | 0.54 | 2.97 | .003** | 0.54 | 2.97 | 0.003** | |||
| Morphological Awareness | 0.09 | 1.22 | .224 | 0.09 | 1.22 | 0.223 | |||
| Phonological Awareness | 0.11 | 4.12 | <.001*** | 0.11 | 3.88 | <0.001*** | |||
| Vocabulary | 0.04 | 1.16 | .246 | 0.04 | 1.16 | 0.247 | |||
| Set for Variability | 0.07 | 3.91 | <.001*** | 0.07 | 3.91 | <0.001*** | |||
| Interactions | |||||||||
| C1 × Concreteness | −0.79 | −2.00 | 0.045* | ||||||
| C1 × Set for Variability | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.978 | ||||||
| C1 × Vocabulary | −0.001 | −.01 | 0.989 | ||||||
| Random Effects | Variance | Variance | % var explained | Variance | % var explained | ||||
| Person | 3.768 | 0.957 | 74.60 | .952 | 74.73 | ||||
| Word | 3.719 | 1.399 | 62.38 | 1.281 | 65.56 | ||||
Note. C1 = Contrast 1; C2 = Contrast 2; Poly = Polymorphemic; Mono = Monomorphemic; Trans = Transparent; SPTR = Spelling to pronunciation transparency rating.
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001.