Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Stud Read. 2022 May 21;26(6):527–544. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2022.2077109

Table 4.

Results from the unconditional model, main effects model, and interaction model without controlling for word reading.

Unconditional Model Main Effects Model Interaction Model


Parameter Logit z-value p-value Logit z-value p-value Logit z-value p-value

Intercept 1.29 3.70 <0.001** 1.27 5.99 <.001*** 0.94 3.62 <0.001**
Word-Level Predictors
 C1: Poly vs Mono words 0.04 0.09 .931 −0.12 −0.28 0.780
 C2: Trans vs NonTrans words 1.53 3.25 .001** 1.46 3.23 0.001**
 SPTR −2.20 −4.26 <.001*** −1.92 −3.73 <0.001***
 Number of letters 0.01 0.04  .968 −0.02 −0.23 0.822
 Frequency 0.07 3.35 <.001*** 0.07 3.66 0.003**
 Concreteness 0.55 2.90 .004** 0.27 1.18 0.238
Person-Level Predicts
 Grade 0.54 2.97 .003** 0.54 2.97  0.003**
 Morphological Awareness 0.09 1.22 .224 0.09 1.22 0.223
 Phonological Awareness 0.11 4.12 <.001*** 0.11 3.88 <0.001***
 Vocabulary 0.04 1.16 .246 0.04 1.16 0.247
 Set for Variability 0.07 3.91 <.001*** 0.07 3.91 <0.001***
Interactions
 C1 × Concreteness −0.79 −2.00 0.045*
 C1 × Set for Variability 0.001 0.01 0.978
 C1 × Vocabulary −0.001 −.01 0.989
Random Effects Variance Variance % var explained Variance % var explained
 Person 3.768 0.957 74.60 .952 74.73
 Word 3.719 1.399 62.38 1.281 65.56

Note. C1 = Contrast 1; C2 = Contrast 2; Poly = Polymorphemic; Mono = Monomorphemic; Trans = Transparent; SPTR = Spelling to pronunciation transparency rating.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.