Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 18;18(6):1235–1242. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.355982

Table 3.

ML algorithms developed for the classification of PD over the past ten years and their accuracies

Reference Title Method Architecture Accuracy
Mancini et al., 2011 Trunk accelerometry reveals postural instability in untreated PD Posture: (i) EO gazes straight ahead at art poster 6 m continuously. (ii) EC, upright standing position; (iii) EC cognitive task (ECT). Linear mixed model; ROC Accuracy for F95: 0.90; FD: 0.82; RMS: 0.93; for jerk (EO) for untreated PD/HC classification.
Sant’Anna et al., 2011 New measure of movement symmetry in early PD patients using symbolic processing of inertial sensor data Walking 30 m hallway at preferred speed (2 minutes) t-test, ROC; ICC Accuracy for PD/HC classification: 0.872; ICC: 0.949
Rigas et al., 2012 Assessment of tremor activity in PD using set of wearable sensors Resting task (resting in bed, on a chair, standing with hand support); Postural task; kinetic tasks (finger to nose, finger to finger, walking, and picking) HMM (Leaving one patient out) Accuracy for posture and action detection: 81%; Accuracy for tremor severity classification: 87%
Scanlon et al., 2013 Accelerometry-based study of lower and upper limb tremors in PD Resting task, Postural task with distracting task [upper and lower limbs, both dexterity dominant and non-dominant] (each 8.2 seconds) Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank texts IIVF50 for RT (P = 0.032), (P = 0.017) lower in the DD lower limb of PwPD compared to HC
Chen et al., 2014 Postural sway in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder as a potential marker of prodromal Parkinson’s disease Upright standing position: arms crossed by chest, looking ahead (every 30 seconds) (i) eyes open (EO) (ii) feet together eyes closed (EC) (iii) feet together EO dual-task (EODT) (iv) feet together EC dual-task (ECDT) (v) tandem standing EO (TEO) ANOVA, t-test, Pearson chi-square test Differences in jerk between PD/HC for EODT (P = 0.030), ECDT (P = 0.015), and TEO (P = 0.023)
Kostikis et al., 2015 Smartphone-based tool for assessing Parkinsonian hand tremor Resting and Postural task (every 30 seconds) Pearson coefficient; Bag DT AUC for PwPD/HC classification: 0.94
Perumal and Sankar, 2016 Gait and tremor assessment for patients with PD using wearable sensors Gait and Tremor (60 seconds) ANOVA, LDA 5-fold cross-validation, ROC Mean accuracy for Gait: 91.58%, ROC: 0.72
AUC for PD/HC classification: 90%
Features able to differentiate PD tremor from atypical PD tremor
Cai et al., 2017 New hybrid intelligent framework for predicting PD Voice recordings of 31 subjects, including 23 PD patients (16 males, 7 females) and 8 healthy controls (3 males, 5 females). Each subject provided an average of six 36-second long phonations of vowels (95 samples total) BFO-SVM, KELM Acc of BFO-SVM: 96.84%, sensitivity: 98.75%, Specificity: 90.83%
Rumman et al., 2018 Early detection of PD using image processing and artificial neural networks SPECT Image dataset retrieved from PPMI database. ANN trained twice: first with ROI area of known subjects, then ROI area of unknown subjects ANN Accuracy: 94%
Sensitivity: 100%
Specificity: 88%
Woodzinski et al., 2019 Deep learning approach to PD detection using voice recordings and convolutional neural networks for image classification 100 voice recordings divided into 10 folds 90/10% (training and validation data). Included 50 HC and 50 PD patient recordings. PC-GITA database created to evaluate the model LSTM, ResNet with 18 layers F1-score, Precision, and recall: 0.92
Accuracy: 0.917
Nair et al., 2020 Predicting early-stage drug-induced Parkinsonism using unsupervised and supervised machine learning Kinematic walking data Logistic regression model Logistic regression accuracy: 0.94, specificity: 0.96, sensitivity: 0.89
Powers et al., 2021 Longitudinal, remote smartwatch monitoring of PD motor defects to inform treatment decisions Motor Fluctuations Monitor for Parkinson’s Disease (MM4PD) algorithm trained on smartwatch tremor data from 3 studies (343 PD, 171 controls), used to track symptom changes with activity, medication, etc. Apple Proprietary Algorithm Post-treatment symptom changes matching clinical expectations: 94%