Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 18;18(6):1179–1185. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.360164

Additional Table 1.

Risk of bias assessment of the animal intervention studies based on SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool

Studies #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9

Tau pathology
Du et al. (2013) [1] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2

Lee et al. (2021) [2] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Liu et al. (2020) [3] Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Perucho et al. (2012) [4] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Portbury et al. (2017) [5] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Pupyshev et al. (2022) [6] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Holler et al. (2016) [7] Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Rodríguez-Navarro et al. (2010) [8] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2

Schaeffer et al. (2012) [9] Schaeffer and Goedert (2012) [10] Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Synucleinopathy

Darabi et al. (2019) [11] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Ferguson et al. (2015) [12] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

He et al. (2016) [13] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2

Howson et al. (2019) [14] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2

Kakoty et al. (2021) [15] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Lin et al. (2020) [16] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Pupyshev et al. (2019) [17] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Pupyshev et al. (2021) [18] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Sarkar et al. (2014) [19] Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Tanji et al. (2015) [20] Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Polyglutamine tract diseases

Debnath et al. (2017) [21] Debnath et al. (2019) [22] Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Im et al. (2013) [23] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Tanaka et al. (2004) [24] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Yang and Yu (2009) [25] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2

Santana et al. (2020) [26] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2

Chen et al. (2015) [27] Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 3 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Castillo et al. (2013) [28] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2

Li et al. (2015) [29] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2

Zhang et al. (2014) [30] Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 1 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2 Inline 2

*Green circle: low risk; yellow circle: unclear; red circle: high risk.

Criterion 1: Random sequence generation.

Criterion 2: Baseline characteristics.

Criterion 3: Allocation concealment.

Criterion 4: Random housing.

Criterion 5: Blinding of caregivers and researchers.

Criterion 6: Random outcome assessments.

Criterion 7: Blinding of assessors.

Criterion 8: Incomplete outcome data.

Criterion 9: Selective outcome reporting.