Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 12;59(5):986–998. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01082-x

Table 3.

Average effect of each potential mediator on poor mental health days when all mediators are included in the model for poor mental health days

Large central metro Noncore
Effect (95% CI) t df p Effect (95% CI) t df p
Income Inequality 0.043 (0.011, 0.075) 2.61 389 0.009 0.053 (0.028, 0.078) 4.17 1376  < 0.001
Social associations − 0.006 (− 0.042, 0.030) − 0.34 389 0.73 0.032 (0.005, 0.058) 2.37 1376 0.02
Access to exercise − 0.104 (− 0.145, − 0.063) − 5.02 389  < 0.001 − 0.061 (− 0.082, − 0.40) − 5.64 1376  < 0.001
Food environment − 0.187 (− 0.233, − 0.160) − 10.49 389  < 0.001 − 0.271 (− 0.297, − 0.246 − 21.00 1376  < 0.001
Mental health providers − 0.035 (− 0.071, − 0.0003) − 1.98 389 0.05 0.050 (0.023, 0.077) 3.65 1376  < 0.001
Air pollution 0.018 (− 0.013, 0.049) 1.12 389 0.26 − 0.043 (− 0.070, − 0.016) − 3.16 1376 0.002
Violent crime 0.062 (0.026, 0.097) 3.44 389  < 0.001 0.048 (0.030, 0.067) 5.16 1376  < 0.001
Severe housing cost − 0.030 (− 0.073, 0.014) − 1.34 389 0.18 − 0.012 (− 0.037, 0.014) − 0.91 1376 0.36

Small metro is the reference category for each urbanicity comparison, and each mediator is standardized to compare effects. This table includes only Large central metro and Noncore counties because these are the only categories for which the total effect of urbanicity on average poor mental health days was statistically significant. See Table 8 in the appendix for potential mediation effects for all urbanicity categories