Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 4;43(1):173–182. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1237-22.2022

Table 2.

Behavioral performance in the stop-signal task

Variable HCs (n = 24) iHUDs (n = 41) Significance test Effect size (Cohen's d) 95% CI
Stop accuracy 0.48 (0.04) 0.47 (0.07) t(62.99) = 0.59, p = 0.556 d = 0.134 −0.02, 0.03
Go accuracy 0.98 (0.02) 0.95 (0.05) t(60.92) = 2.95, p = 0.004* d = 0.640 0.01, 0.04
SSRT 277 (40.9) 276 (67.0) t(62.85) = 0.05, p = 0.960 d = 0.012 −26.10, 27.40
SSD 288 (94.8) 313 (143) t(61.91) = 0.83, p = 0.412 d = 0.191 −83.50, 34.60
Go RT 585 (83.3) 633 (131) t(62.48) = 1.79, p = 0.078 d = 0.411 −100.71, 5.51
d′ 0.62 (0.04) 0.57 (0.08) t(62.80) = 3.07, p = 0.003* d = 0.683 0.02, 0.08

Significant group differences (corrected for familywise error, α = 0.05/6 = 0.008) are flagged with an asterisk. Values in parentheses denote SD. Go accuracy was calculated as go responses divided by the total of correct and incorrect go responses.