. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 13.

Published in final edited form as: Biling (Camb Engl). 2022 Mar 8;25(5):899–912. doi: 10.1017/s1366728922000104

Table 4.

Results from Latent Profile Analyses

	BIC	Δ BIC	ABIC	Δ ABIC	Entropy	BLRT
2 Profiles	4029.24	165.28	3940.60	196.94	0.938	216.09^***
3 Profiles	3987.32	41.92	3867.03	73.57	0.823	92.73^***
4 Profiles	3971.05	16.27	3819.10	47.93	0.842	67.09^***
5 Profiles	3980.05	9.00	3796.44	22.66	0.877	41.82^***

Note. BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion; ABIC = Sample Size Adjusted Bayesian Information Criterion; BLRT = Bootstrapped Likelihood Ratio Test. Value reported for BLRT is two times the log likelihood difference between the two models being compared. Because the best log-likelihood value could not be replicated in the 4-profile model, the 3-profile model was chosen as the final model.

^***

p < .001