Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 15;11:e85171. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85171

Figure 2. Parasite motility within a 3D fibrin matrix.

(A) Confocal imaging of a 2.25 mg/ml fluorescent fibrin gel. A maximum fluorescence intensity projection of 51 z-slices captured 0.25 µm apart is shown; scale bar = 10 µm. (B) Maximum fluorescence intensity projections showing the trajectories of tdTomato-expressing wildtype parasites moving in 3D in Matrigel (top) vs. fibrin (bottom). See Figure 2—figure supplement 1 for quantitative comparison of the motility parameters in the two matrices. Scale bar = 40 µm. (C) A parasite moving in a 1.3 mg/ml fluorescent fibrin matrix (see Video 5) visibly deforms the matrix, as evident from the non-coincident fluorescence signals in the highlighted area at the time points indicated (merge). Scale bar = 10 µm, timestamps in seconds.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Quantitative comparison of parasite motility in fluorescent fibrin vs. Matrigel.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Comparison of the maximum and mean speeds of parasites in 2.25 mg/ml fibrin vs. Matrigel. (B) Comparison of the proportion of parasites moving in 2.25 mg/ml fibrin vs. Matrigel. Horizontal bars indicate mean (± SD) from three independent biological replicates, each consisting of three technical replicates (Matrigel n=853, Fibrin n=913 parasites total). p>0.05 for each pairwise Matrigel vs. fibrin comparison, Student’s two-tailed t-test.