Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 13;118(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s00395-022-00974-z

Table 1.

CMR characteristics for control rats, imatinib and placebo treated rats

Control (n = 5) Imatinib (n = 10*) Placebo (n = 9) p-value
Control vs Placebo
p-value
Imatinib vs Placebo
Heart rate (bpm) 370.6 ± 36.2 372.6 ± 41.6 357.7 ± 35.5 0.53 0.41
LVEDV (mL) 0.32 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.04 0.040 0.48
LVESV (mL) 0.13 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.03 0.88 0.55
SV (mL) 0.20 ± 0.02 0.18 ± 0.04 0.16 ± 0.04 0.068 0.30
CO (mL/min) 68 ± 8.4 63 ± 13.4 54 ± 13.3 0.064 0.18
LVEF (%) 60.3 ± 4.2 59.0 ± 8.4 54.0 ± 9.8 0.20 0.24
GCS (%) − 38.0 ± 2.2 − 35.4 ± 7.5 − 31.3 ± 7.5 0.078 0.24
GLS (%) − 22.0 ± 1.3 − 16.6 ± 3.1 − 15.7 ± 3.3  < 0.001 0.54
LV mass (mg) 378 ± 8 424 ± 67 413 ± 35 0.017 0.67
Infarct size (%LV) N.a 12.6 ± 8.8 25.6 ± 9.3 N.a 0.008
Remote T2 values (ms) 20.2 ± 2.6 19.4 ± 4.8 19.3 ± 5.5 0.74 0.97
Infarct T2 values (ms) N.a 37.9 ± 12.0 41.0 ± 16.0 N.a 0.65

Numbers can be written down in bold (without italics) to highlight the differences between the groups

Data is presented as mean ± SD, assessed by independent-samples T test

Bpm beats per minute, CO cardiac output, EDV end-diastolic volume, EF ejection fraction, ESV end-systolic volume, GCS global circumferential strain, GLS global longitudinal strain, LV left ventricle, N.a not applicable, SV stroke volume

*n = 10 for cardiac function, n = 9 for infarct size and T2 values