Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 13;13:749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27808-9

Table 2.

Comparative analysis of different models trained using our proposed CCS-based self-training technique with standard self-training in terms of average accuracy (Avg. Acc), mean intersection over union (mIoU), and dice similarity score.

Standard self-training CCS-based self-training
Teacher model Student model Backbone Avg. Acc mIoU Dice Teacher model Student model Backbone Avg. Acc mIoU Dice
Deeplabv3 (ResNet-101) Deeplabv3 ResNet-50 91.77 45.07 0.45 Deeplabv3 (ResNet-101) Deeplabv3 ResNet-50 94.57 46.35 0.46
ResNet-101 93.22 47.83 0.47 ResNet-101 99.43 50.73 0.50
Mobilenet-v3 90.15 44.38 0.44 Mobilenet-v3 95.08 45.60 0.45
FCN ResNet-50 90.04 44.81 0.44 FCN ResNet-50 97.61 47.52 0.47
ResNet-101 92.98 45.95 0.45 ResNet-101 95.84 45.87 0.45
LRASPP Mobilenet-v3 87.41 42.73 0.42 LRASPP Mobilenet-v3 91.72 40.16 0.40

Significant values are in bold.