Table 1.
OLES scale | M | SD | Difference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | P | Diff | A | P | Effect size | t | |
Computer usage (CU) | 3.80 | 3.26 | − 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.74 | − 0.48 | − 5.71** |
Teacher support (TS) | 3.76 | 4.00 | 0.24 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.26 | 2.76** |
Student interaction & collaboration (SIC) | 3.72 | 3.22 | − 0.50 | 0.88 | 0.84 | − 0.48 | − 4.21** |
Personal relevance (PR) | 3.84 | 3.77 | − 0.07 | 0.75 | 0.67 | − 0.07 | − 0.73 |
Authentic learning (AL) | 3.95 | 3.94 | − 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.74 | − 0.01 | − 0.18 |
Student autonomy (SA) | 4.19 | 4.07 | − 0.12 | 0.69 | 0.68 | − 0.15 | − 1.12 |
Equity (EQ) | 4.08 | 3.96 | − 0.12 | 0.68 | 0.70 | -0.14 | − 1.24 |
Asynchronicity (AS) | 3.83 | 3.79 | − 0.04 | 0.77 | 0.64 | − 0.04 | − 0.36 |
**P < 0.01, n = 99, Average item mean = scale mean divided by the number of items in that scale
Effect size = difference between means divided by the pooled SD
The individual student score was used as the unit of analysis