Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 28;10(1):nwac238. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac238

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic, genetic and morphological information for both cultured and uncultured MTB. Comparison of the 15 studied strains (bold font with light orange background) (Supplementary Figs S1–15) with 32 data sets from previous studies (Supplementary Table S3). (a) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on concatenated alignment of 120 ubiquitous conserved proteins. Strain names in bold and yellow background; white background and grey font represent genomes reported in this study, reported previously and containing high contamination (>10%), respectively. The genome of Candidatus Omnitrophus magneticus strain SKK-01 was used to root the tree. (b) Pie charts of genome completeness evaluated using checkM v1.0.12 (Supplementary Table S3). Dark blue and yellow regions represent the percentage of present and absent genes, respectively. (c) Comparison of MGCs from MTB strains with distinct lineages. (d) TEM images of representative MTB strains (left column) and their magnetic particles (right column).