Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 16;2023(1):CD004917. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004917.pub4

Summary of findings 1. Surgery versus botulinum neurotoxin injections.

Surgery compared with botulinum toxin injections in children with infantile esotropia
Patient or population: children with infantile esotropia
Settings: tertiary care, single center
Intervention: surgery
Comparison: botulinum toxin injections
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No. of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Botulinum toxin injections Surgery
Treatment success: improvement in the angle of strabismus at 6 months 370 per 1000  696 per 1000
(470 to 1000)
RR 1.88
(95%CI 1.27 to 2.77)
101
(1)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b 23 children (48.9%) in the surgery arm, who had > 60 prism diopters at baseline, also received botulinum toxin intraoperatively.
Presence and quality of binocularity at 6 months No outcome data available for this outcome
Adverse effects (severe, minor) in 6 months See comments 101
(1)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b Reported in botulinum toxin arm: partial transient ptosis in 9 (16.7%) children, transient vertical deviation in 3 (5.6%) children, and consecutive exotropia in 13 (24.1%) children
*The assumed risk is based on the estimate (proportion of participants with the case) in the control group. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded one level for study limitations due to high risk of bias in the randomization process, deviations from intended interventions, and missing outcome data
bDowngraded two levels for imprecision of results