Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 9;63(11):1308–1315. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13575

Table 4.

Associations between all childhood adversity dimensions measures tested simultaneously and biological aging measures

Childhood DNAm Change in DNAm
β 95%CI p β 95%CI p
Dimensions
 Threat 0.02 −0.10–0.14 0.74 0.00 −0.10–0.10 0.98
 Material Deprivation −0.08 −0.18–0.03 0.17 0.02 −0.08–0.11 0.70
 Loss −0.05 −0.16–0.06 0.34 0.07 −0.02–0.17 0.15
 Unpredictability −0.04 −0.15–0.07 0.52 0.09 −0.01–0.18 0.08
Other adversities −0.01 −0.11–0.11 0.99 0.06 −0.04–0.15 0.23

Tables represents results from 2 regression models. Each model adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity. The change in DNAm models adjusted for time between observations. All childhood adversity are scales of total number of events reported at any point in childhood. Regression coefficients are standardized.