Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;44(2):587–592. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06438-5

Table 1.

Background and clinical features of patients that underwent the FAB

N 297
Age (years) 63.1 ± 11.2 (28–88)
Sex (M/F) 62.3%/37.7%
Education (years) 11.6 ± 4.4 (5–24)
Handedness (right/left) 94.6%/5.4%
Disease duration (months) 17.4 ± 15.9 (2–120)
ALSFRS-R
  Total 39.2 ± 5.5 (23–48)
  Bulbar 10.5 ± 2 (4–12)
  Spinal–lower limbs 11.2 ± 3.8 (0–16)
  Spinal–upper limbs 6.2 ± 1.8 (1–8)
  Respiratory 11.3 ± 1.5 (3–12)
  ΔFS 0.8 ± 0.8 (0–5.3)
KSS
  Stage 0 1.9%
  Stage 1 36.2%
  Stage 2 34%
  Stage 3 23.4%
  Stage 4 4.5%
MiToS
  Stage 0 76.6%
  Stage 1 20.8%
  Stage 2 2.6%
  PEG 0.3%
  NIV 4.1%
Genetics
  C9orf72 7.1%
  SOD1 2.7%
  TARDBP 3.4%
  FUS 0.3%
FAB
  Raw scores 15.7 ± 2.1 (8–18)
  Below-cut-off scoresa 12.1%
ECAS
  Total 99.8 ± 18.6 (31–129)
  ALS-specific 73.8 ± 15.1 (21–97)
  ALS-nonspecific 26 ± 5 (9–34)
  Language 23.4 ± 3.9 (10–28)
  Fluency 16.3 ± 5.6 (0–24)
  Executive 34 ± 7.8 (7–47)
  Memory 14.6 ± 4.6 (1–22)
  Visuo-spatial 11.4 ± 1 (6–12)
  ECAS-CI 0.7 ± 0.9 (0–5)

Notes. ΔFS progression rate, ALS amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALSFRS-R Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised, ECAS Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen, F female, FAB Frontal Assesment Battery, KSS King’s staging system, M male, MiToS Milano-Torino staging system, NIV non-invasive ventilation, PEG percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy aAppollonio et al. [21]